IETF Logo Mail Archive

[rtcweb] Draft agenda for RTCWeb session 2 at IETF85

"Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com> Fri, 19 October 2012 18:59 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBC1221F87E0 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 11:59:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.089, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vmlbR63fQTsa for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 11:59:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1765821F87AE for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 11:59:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1109; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1350673191; x=1351882791; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=8p25TVpXv4FFWGU7+MrAol/2qgy+QMz7eHmbOuWTve4=; b=k6bOv4Ic7ImRSe92QU5hYtu2PiI6nDXt83DbTyj13zdfRMo0eTfW8aiF mxr2YYAoIGeot4AMk8D2uq5AwapKVNzTRueMlZxW9dlqSvfDo5G+5+JZx T7Wcog/itcNoPZypMQGJlmTitEncGUAPKaQyFH/jBKHmoaRm1fZOVUoA8 U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAE+igVCtJXG+/2dsb2JhbABFwHKBCIIiAQQSASc/EgEqFEInBA4NGodinBSgIJFpYAOkPIFrgm+CGA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,615,1344211200"; d="scan'208";a="133537886"
Received: from rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com ([173.37.113.190]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Oct 2012 18:59:50 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com [173.36.12.89]) by rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q9JIxogm002988 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 19 Oct 2012 18:59:50 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.217]) by xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com ([173.36.12.89]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.001; Fri, 19 Oct 2012 13:59:50 -0500
From: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Draft agenda for RTCWeb session 2 at IETF85
Thread-Index: AQHNrivq8oeI28mUY0KtpB99zlJ4jw==
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 18:59:50 +0000
Message-ID: <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB111891794@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.20.249.167]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19284.002
x-tm-as-result: No--21.465500-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <4C1EDE7E7D3A484FB6D46D62679A32C9@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [rtcweb] Draft agenda for RTCWeb session 2 at IETF85
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 18:59:51 -0000

We have two WebRTC session at the next IETF. We have not worked out the agenda for the first session yet but our current plan is to dedicate the second session to the MTI video codec question. 

The draft agenda for this season is:

Admin issues (5 min)

IPR at the IETF ( 10 min )
- this is a reminder of IETF rules and guidelines around IPR

Presentations ( 80 min )
- a 20 minute presentation from each of the following drafts 
     draft-alvestrand-rtcweb-vp8-00
     draft-burman-rtcweb-h264-proposal-00
     draft-dbenham-webrtc-videomti-00
     draft-marjou-rtcweb-video-codec-00
- If the authors of drafts recommending the same codec can consult with
each other to avoid overlap, or even merge presentations, the
recovered time would be given to the general discussion.


General discussion (  30 min )
- general time for everyone to speak at the mic to express information important for the decision


Call the question of which mandatory to implement video codec to select  ( 5 min )


Next steps ( 20 min )


Cullen, Magnus, and Ted <RTCWeb Chairs>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email