Re: [rtcweb] RTCWEB Session 2: A plea for brevity

["Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <[e-mail]>]

On Oct 20, 2012, at 10:13 AM, Bernard Aboba <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Cullen Jennings said:
> 
> "One of the drafts says when making measurements on quality they found A was
> better than B while the another draft says B was better than A.  Several
> people have asked me how this could happen two different groups ended up
> with opposite measurements and they want to understand more about how this
> could have happened and which is correct.... Let me ask you guys a question,
> how many people do you think will be in the microphone line up when these
> two are discussed?""
> 
> [BA] Assuming those at the mic would be asking clarifying questions, why do
> we need to wait until IETF 85 to begin that discussion?   If each side were
> to start a thread on the list, at least some of the clarifying questions
> could be gotten out of the way beforehand.  Who knows, the result could be
> akin to letting a child stay up late on Saturday night to watch TV - the
> little devil might be too tired to cause trouble at church on Sunday :)
> 

+1 for starting list conversation before the meeting … It will be a bit crunched as many people are still working on -01 drafts till monday, then have a few days to read drafts and travel to Europe for W3C meeting then go straight from W3C meeting to IETF. I really hope there can be some good list discussion ahead of time.