Re: [rtcweb] Request for input from WebRTC JS (web app) developers (please respond if you are *using* the API)

thanks for the effort.
I think it goes in the right direction.
I filled my part.

regards,

alex.

On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>wrote:

> I don't know if this has been done already, but I think that the WG could
> really use come good feedback from the JS developers out there actually
> using the WebRTC API.  What are you making?  What's working well? What's
> not working well?  Do you like SDP?  (Try to be constructive with that last
> one).
>
> So, I made a little spreadsheet where you can leave feedback:
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AuaKXw3SkHMSdHlZdV9RN0xSWFhybVl4anJLRkVPV0E#gid=0
>
> If you are a JS developer using the WebRTC API, would you please fill in
> some feedback?  If you can't give details about what you're working on, I
> can understand that.  But please give us a sense of what is working well
> and what isn't.  I think it would help the WG a lot.  But please do
> remember  that the WG is focusing on getting 1.0 out the door and probably
> wants to hear something more constructive than "I hate it; start over", so
> try to be constructive, especially when talking about SDP.
>
> Speaking of SDP, I read through 190+ recent emails about SDP (yeah... hot
> topic!) and collected quotes from some of you and put them in the
> spreadsheet.  If you don't like that, I apologize; please let me know, or
> just remove yourself from the doc.  I wanted to do the same for the other
> questions, but found it too hard.  So I hope you'll help me :).
>
> (I didn't include anyone from Google, Mozilla, or Microsoft;  I wanted
> this to be feedback for developers, not implementors, even if the
> implementors are also developers;  And I didn't include myself :)
>
> Thank you so much for your feedback!
>
>
>
>
> PS: if anyone is interested, my quick tally of opinions of SDP indicate:
>
> Like: 3
> Strongly Dislike: 6
> Would like something else, or at least discussion of something else: 5
>
> I may have gotten some wrong, so please give feedback to help it be more
> accurate.
>
> Thanks again!
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>