Re: [rtcweb] Use-case grouping

Seems to me sensible to have groupings.

The use case I don't see a place for at the moment is the single 
point-to-point call; the proposed use case I don't see mentioned below 
is my suggestion for "interoperable calling".

So this might require more tuning.

On 06/21/11 14:39, Christer Holmberg wrote:
> Hi,
> It's nice to see the amount of use-cases people have submitted :)
> Now, since many of the use-cases are related to each other, and in 
> order to get a better and easy-to-read structure of the document, I 
> would like to suggest to devide the use-cases into different "use-case 
> groups".
> Below is a proposed grouping, and examples of use-cases which would be 
> listed in each group. I have only used the existing use-cases, and the 
> ones suggested by Cullen, but I am aware that more use-cases have been 
> proposed :)
> Telephony use-cases:
>     - Telephony terminal use-case (draft)
>     - Call fedex use-case (Cullen)
> Video conferenceing use-cases:
>     - With central server (draft)
>     - Without central server (draft)
>     - Hockey (draft)
>     - Screen re-size (Cullen)
> Embedded voice communicatoin use-case:
>    - Multiparty on-line game with voice communication (draft)
> Bandwidth/QoS/mobility use-cases:
>    - NIC Change (Cullen)
>    - QoS Marking (Cullen)
> Later, we can of course modify/add/remove groups, but I think the 
> grouping above would be a good start, and I think all the use-cases so 
> far proposed would fit into one of those groups.
> Comments?
> Regards,
> Christer
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb