Re: [rtcweb] Dual stack RTCweb

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Mon, 15 August 2011 06:42 UTC

Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2035721F857D for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 23:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.854
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.854 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.745, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tQ1L47T-kH1s for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 23:42:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E1B021F8571 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 23:42:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A0DD39E112; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 08:41:33 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PBgsWFXW5eeh; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 08:41:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.0.14] (c213-89-141-213.bredband.comhem.se [213.89.141.213]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A97D939E074; Mon, 15 Aug 2011 08:41:32 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4E48BFE5.9080504@alvestrand.no>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 08:42:45 +0200
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Olle E. Johansson" <oej@edvina.net>
References: <21A83EF5-206B-47CA-A055-C86E590EBEEF@edvina.net>
In-Reply-To: <21A83EF5-206B-47CA-A055-C86E590EBEEF@edvina.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Dual stack RTCweb
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 06:42:02 -0000

On 08/12/2011 04:39 PM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
> Coming in late to the discussion, I can't find any traces of a discussion about dual stacks. Are the issues related with this supposed to be solved with ICE/STUN/Turn - if so, shouldn't this be documented?
I think ICE/STUN is supposed to solve the issue of setting up a 
connection that is either IPv6 or IPv4. Bernard Aboba mentioned in 
Quebec that he had some experience in this area - Bernard, can you share?
> If not, what do we do? Happy RTC-eyeballs?
>
> /O
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>