IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] RTCWeb and STIR

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Tue, 10 May 2016 07:21 UTC

Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 345AB12D0F6 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2016 00:21:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.196
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7uvMVpOZq11j for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2016 00:21:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no (mork.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8053E12D0C0 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 May 2016 00:21:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BB977C7C65 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 May 2016 09:21:23 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mork.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bp8Q4y0Dyyeb for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 May 2016 09:21:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:de0a:1:80f6:ea9b:212a:eb5a] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:de0a:1:80f6:ea9b:212a:eb5a]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3681D7C7C5F for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 May 2016 09:21:22 +0200 (CEST)
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <1D53717F-3679-4E9C-B612-FA75BFF13032@iii.ca>
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Message-ID: <57318BF1.4050006@alvestrand.no>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 09:21:21 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1D53717F-3679-4E9C-B612-FA75BFF13032@iii.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/8ApIzdth12QyhPM2JPpV1Pgo9O8>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] RTCWeb and STIR
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 07:21:27 -0000

Den 09. mai 2016 22:31, skrev Cullen Jennings:
> 
> 
> I've been looking at how WebRTC Identity and STIR work together and put together a worked out example at 
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-jennings-stir-rtcweb-identity-00.txt
> 
> It does not propose any significant changes to WebRTC but it does point at a few syntax changes that might make things easier. 
> 
> Probably the key change for RTCWeb would be to unify the syntax we use for DTLS-SRTP fingerprints. 


The fingerprint syntax comes from SDP/DTLS, not from RTCWeb, I believe.

It might be best for STIR to either get with the party or propose an SDP
change for DTLS.

> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email