[rtcweb] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-thomson-rtcweb-alpn-00.txt

[Martin Thomson <[e-mail]>]

The intent of this draft is to address the isolation issue.

Unlike a TLS extension, this doesn't require that the TLS WG provide
an official blessing.  Though I'll note that this is the advice that
at least two participants in that working group suggested for
addressing this problem.

In short: negotiate "webrtc" if you are doing the usual, insecure
thing; negotiate "c-webrtc" if you would like media confidentiality.

>>
A new version of I-D, draft-thomson-rtcweb-alpn-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Martin Thomson and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:           draft-thomson-rtcweb-alpn
Revision:       00
Title:          Application Layer Protocol Negotiation for Web
Real-Time Communications (WebRTC)
Document date:  2014-04-09
Group:          Individual Submission
Pages:          6
URL:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-thomson-rtcweb-alpn-00.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-thomson-rtcweb-alpn/
Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-rtcweb-alpn-00


Abstract:
   Application Layer Protocol Negotiation (ALPN) labels are defined for
   use in identifying Web Real-Time Communications (WebRTC) usages of
   Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS).  Labels are provided for
   identifying a session that uses a combination of WebRTC compatible
   media and data, and for identifying a session requiring
   confidentiality protection.