[rtcweb] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-thomson-rtcweb-alpn-00.txt

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 09 April 2014 18:09 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C147B1A0303 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 11:09:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3tPwpRLlL1KK for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 11:09:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22f.google.com (mail-wg0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F49A1A03FD for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 11:09:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id x12so2842239wgg.6 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Apr 2014 11:09:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=TnYfqNC+T9PXIkuCu1fbnAFfq7jd4fq+nsamdNO2Sws=; b=tw0uL74oCD0JJBSgV5pwDPDt0I1zTHrUfFdiewNJNbBdir6K12Pfyo6HuKwuN56tge xTEG7yjDmF8ngmMjsUX5oSfC/aR8OLdKA4mOAdEZ0Mrfj/241JgZRVok6LguSE6cJ0JI vLZ8XhnLsKIMs2eAYvWn3lawi6C5+v0UWmLX3TM/4YChjI+08yrs8CYssiEinqvpMy10 oCycI+3kecaFmqZybbhKk+3NwrKgZR6OlhR7Rzro31KJ9mKW63Tm49nuOHE7e1dOpvo4 EQQ9DCYqV9y1My1WzlQH5qdMYVcQxnFBcDQQ3CFduvJH+bRd5Wok7ObBk73662ywssq0 IAkw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.192.132 with SMTP id hg4mr11078536wjc.28.1397066960049; Wed, 09 Apr 2014 11:09:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.144.132 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 11:09:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20140409180350.13315.51677.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20140409180350.13315.51677.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 11:09:20 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUfT_bRmFW7j09yWJPEOCz9xEjKjbHa=FXK284aEnyDyQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/8hF64wtCHxjCdHEH14o_wFKpmnk
Subject: [rtcweb] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-thomson-rtcweb-alpn-00.txt
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 18:09:26 -0000

The intent of this draft is to address the isolation issue.

Unlike a TLS extension, this doesn't require that the TLS WG provide
an official blessing.  Though I'll note that this is the advice that
at least two participants in that working group suggested for
addressing this problem.

In short: negotiate "webrtc" if you are doing the usual, insecure
thing; negotiate "c-webrtc" if you would like media confidentiality.

>>
A new version of I-D, draft-thomson-rtcweb-alpn-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Martin Thomson and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:           draft-thomson-rtcweb-alpn
Revision:       00
Title:          Application Layer Protocol Negotiation for Web
Real-Time Communications (WebRTC)
Document date:  2014-04-09
Group:          Individual Submission
Pages:          6
URL:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-thomson-rtcweb-alpn-00.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-thomson-rtcweb-alpn/
Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-rtcweb-alpn-00


Abstract:
   Application Layer Protocol Negotiation (ALPN) labels are defined for
   use in identifying Web Real-Time Communications (WebRTC) usages of
   Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS).  Labels are provided for
   identifying a session that uses a combination of WebRTC compatible
   media and data, and for identifying a session requiring
   confidentiality protection.