Re: [rtcweb] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-kaufman-rtp-compatible-data-00.txt

Matthew Kaufman <matthew.kaufman@skype.net> Mon, 11 July 2011 16:59 UTC

Return-Path: <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7745711E8086 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 09:59:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WNPxjBH4V+Uw for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 09:59:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.skype.net (mx.skype.net [78.141.177.88]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 756DD21F8D25 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 09:59:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.skype.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C32316E2; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 18:59:39 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=skype.net; h=subject :mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=mx; bh=wq CHfvOiCjJ0apsEEpQ3ecdGAA4=; b=rJnrdDwCMereLmVrhjH5BJOX0S4SKMRgCX hEsqPaSC9yyS5Le8plRpiaqUwCkciluKY7rc9zGXYNzPnISlVcxYRgoDtcJz8A+s uQ6e4LVdlZCUaA3MVy6Gpj7LPdtbhmH2W4scK8xCdRdOvR0GKjuoGw7Mzg+XCKlM lijZIFF5g=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=skype.net; h=subject:mime-version :content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:references:to; q=dns; s=mx; b=KX8axG9qzoCL5UngtrGtbN SwvEwW57ERsjYN5q/MQjJFdR/tUVZFqYD52S7j7zXvJDkOHXhsf31EW37Njv1T3O WsggYh9smmsceaolK8ugi3iorfRmoK9dsNvD/jtnLbL+kK+4U1ZYpHtLJGOFETwM p+01PnSTfcQy8b1qlmP10=
Received: from zimbra.skype.net (zimbra.skype.net [78.141.177.82]) by mx.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AD087F8; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 18:59:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2920735079F2; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 18:59:39 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at lu2-zimbra.skype.net
Received: from zimbra.skype.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.skype.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j+J59i8EVa4H; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 18:59:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [172.17.61.96] (50-0-2-20.static.sonic.net [50.0.2.20]) by zimbra.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F9753507767; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 18:59:37 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Matthew Kaufman <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
In-Reply-To: <4E0DB92F.8010501@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 09:59:34 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7658C729-8578-42E3-9193-6884756D18A6@skype.net>
References: <20110630004852.10947.88695.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <910D1894-3B1D-49CA-BAEF-9F50FF2B4ADB@skype.net> <4E0DB92F.8010501@ericsson.com>
To: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-kaufman-rtp-compatible-data-00.txt
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:59:41 -0000

On Jul 1, 2011, at 5:10 AM, Stefan Håkansson LK wrote:

> Reading the draft I get the impression that the intention is to multiplex (multiple) RTP streams with arbitrary datagrams on the same 5-tuple. In that light the method lacks IMO:
> 
> * There is no multiplexing support for different RTP flows - as discussed at the Interim meeting session separation should be maintained

This draft doesn't address that.

> 
> * There is no support for rate/congestion control of the datagrams
> 

Correct. This is a tool for getting datagrams sent and received. Congestion control, reliability, etc. are all a high-layer problem than this.

> * There is no support for multiplexing different datagram flows (the need for this can be argued though - could be done by the web app)
> 

I would argue that this is an application problem, or possibly the responsibility of a layer that goes above this.

Matthew Kaufman