Re: [rtcweb] H.264 SVC and BUNDLE

"Roni Even" <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Thu, 30 August 2012 08:56 UTC

Return-Path: <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C23A21F8528 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PxOgdyVrwaVd for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bk0-f44.google.com (mail-bk0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A410B21F852B for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:56:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bkty12 with SMTP id y12so685559bkt.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:56:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index :content-language; bh=ej6tG9FvJf2prhhhm7ZqYVknPex+jSPMJ+Vp10KEvbQ=; b=jpZ+StA2/psn5ad218X+egIQedHAxlm4O9qWF4dLhjG/cLYZOgtJujXX8zE8JTY57a jgcQ53rSJIM+eKNxUpBFXcAyXUuzhkOnVpu8avMen5fky9zcAP4iUt7wYwUvQTgNxmXS +vuEjs1OLexJKozQimi+d78k3cjBEMhSMGXtTVKS0QAWSpojV51be8vpVzAAKLmeMHuW 3rtY2fRRg5IcYA0eKQDxq/FAQ6tpJyFSFjNchbQxdyqg4ivx7C6ANDR2Bx4K9f7zeyzD kG8lvL4f2jx6RehWEM3q5c5U/jDFD8bfuHOVjxD/Zn7OvC2UyBI33G3Z4ct1jOn2RZcJ kq3Q==
Received: by 10.204.129.16 with SMTP id m16mr2345601bks.136.1346316990549; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:56:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from RoniE (bzq-79-181-188-119.red.bezeqint.net. [79.181.188.119]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 25sm575270bkx.9.2012.08.30.01.56.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: 'Christer Holmberg' <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, 'Dan Wing' <dwing@cisco.com>, public-webrtc@w3.org, rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <503E0B63.3020708@ericsson.com>, <E17CAD772E76C742B645BD4DC602CD8106A9810E@NAHALD.us.int.genesyslab.com> <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05853409FF2F4C@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>, <035101cd8636$3b654160$b22fc420$@com> <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05853409FF2F5C@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05853409FF2F5C@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:55:02 +0200
Message-ID: <01ec01cd8695$8d9e18d0$a8da4a70$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQIzoVsTffJikefIEe0h9tDJmRrw2QFxiOsLAm1vqdkBzS0U/QJ+6QqqlmSO4hA=
Content-Language: en-us
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] H.264 SVC and BUNDLE
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:56:32 -0000

Christer,
This is about the multiple session support in MST, look at the example in
section 7.3.3 of RFC6190, using the DDP grouping attribute from RFC5583.
I assume that you can solve it using RFC5576 ssrc-group but you will need to
define the DDP to be used also for ssrc-group

Roni

-----Original Message-----
From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Christer Holmberg
Sent: 30 August, 2012 9:51 AM
To: Dan Wing; public-webrtc@w3.org; rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] H.264 SVC and BUNDLE


Hi Dan,

Thanks for the information!

The issue you raise is of course not related to BUNDLE, but to multiplexing
in general.

Regards,

Christer
________________________________________
From: Dan Wing [dwing@cisco.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 1:32 AM
To: Christer Holmberg; public-webrtc@w3.org; rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [rtcweb] H.264 SVC and BUNDLE

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Christer Holmberg
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 11:50 AM
> To: public-webrtc@w3.org; rtcweb@ietf.org
> Subject: [rtcweb] H.264 SVC and BUNDLE
>
> Hi,
>
> At the telco yesterday one of the Microsoft guys claimed that H.264 
> SVC does not work with BUNDLE, but he didn't have the details.
>
> Could someone please explain the reason why he/she doesn't think H.264 
> SVC work with BUNDLE?
>
> (Note, that if using the same port for the different codec layers is a 
> problem, then it's not a BUNDLE problem - it's a generic multiplexing
> problem.)

The general multiplexing of layers onto the same 5-tuple is a problem,
*if* we want the layers to have different DSCP values.  This is because we
cannot successfully and reliably set different DSCP values for packets
belonging to a 5-tuple over the Internet -- too many things rewrite the DSCP
field (to a different value) or simply clear the DSCP field.
This makes it impossible to restore the per-packet DSCP values later (e.g.,
using RSVP, or using any other better/stronger/faster signaling method).
If, however, each 5-tuple has its own DSCP value then that DSCP value could
be restored.

-d

> Thanks!
>
> Regards,
>
> Christer
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

_______________________________________________
rtcweb mailing list
rtcweb@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb