Re: [rtcweb] Use-case document - additional recording use case

Stefan Hakansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> Tue, 20 March 2012 10:58 UTC

Return-Path: <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1511A21F8656 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 03:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.829
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.829 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.770, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YYpuIf6nYwcu for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 03:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw10.se.ericsson.net (mailgw10.se.ericsson.net [193.180.251.61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25BBF21F8650 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 03:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3d-b7c6fae0000045c0-57-4f6862d52fc4
Received: from esessmw0184.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw10.se.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 7B.B5.17856.5D2686F4; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 11:58:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [150.132.142.245] (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0184.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.82) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.213.0; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 11:58:28 +0100
Message-ID: <4F6862D4.7040407@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 11:58:28 +0100
From: Stefan Hakansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Avasarala, Ranjit" <Ranjit.Avasarala@Polycom.com>
References: <1F2A2C70609D9E41844A2126145FC09804BC4CE1F2@HKGMBOXPRD22.polycom.com>
In-Reply-To: <1F2A2C70609D9E41844A2126145FC09804BC4CE1F2@HKGMBOXPRD22.polycom.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: "Banerjee, Atin" <Atin.Banerjee@Polycom.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Use-case document - additional recording use case
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:58:31 -0000

Hi Ranjit,

recording was discussed at length last fall (and is to some extent 
captured in the document) without really concluding.

This fact, and the fact that there was really no support for your 
proposal makes me think we should not add this use-case (at least not now).

Br,
Stefan

On 03/07/2012 07:07 AM, Avasarala, Ranjit wrote:
> Hi Stefan
>
> Could we add a use case related to session recording? The use case would be
>
> 4.2. x Simple Video Recording Service
>
> 4.2. x.1 Description
>
> The user who has joined a video communication service wants to record the communication data from the web browser.
>
> 4.2.x.1.1  Derived requirements
>
> TBD
>
> I also feel there is a need for a API requirement - the Web API should provide a means to record the incoming media - both audio&  video or audio only or video only
>
> Regards
> Ranjit
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stefan Hakansson LK
> Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 2:59 PM
> To: rtcweb@ietf.org
> Subject: [rtcweb] Use-case document
>
> Hi!
>
> The Use-case document
> (<http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements/?include_text=1>)
> will expire in early April.
>
> The editors propose to add a new use-case when updating to -07. The new use-case is about large sessions and is inspired by input made earlier by Arno Bakker
> (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg00530.html) and recently by Harald Alvestrand (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webrtc/2012Feb/0066.html).
>
> Proposed text for the new use-case:
>
> On-line lecture
> ===============
>
> A lecture is given on-line by a very popular lecturer. The attendance is very large. Because of this it is not really feasible to have direct audiovisual feedback (for e.g. questions) for every participant, instead participants can request the floor by clicking a button, and gets a signal when audio and video has been set up (and the lecturer is ready to take the question). The question is heard by all participants (not only the lecturer).
>
> Participants can join and leave the lecture at any time (i.e. they do not need to be there at the start to be able to connect).
>
> The service is operated by the university of the lecturer. It is set up such that all participants connect to a central node. The university can not invest much in HW, so the processing required (per participant) must be minimized.
>
>
> New requirement:
>
> - It must be possible to set up media streams and encryption in such a way that processing in a central node is minimized (no transcoding required, no decryption/re-encryption for every outgoing flow - just simple forwarding).
>
>
> Let us know what you think. If there is support we will add this use-case, if not we will just make a new revision of the document (with no major changes to the content).
>
> Stefan for the editors
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb