Re: [rtcweb] WGLC for data channel drafts - sub-protocol usage
Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> Mon, 07 July 2014 19:51 UTC
Return-Path: <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 477021B28AB for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 12:51:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.202
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6z5wxKtyoZER for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 12:51:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-n.franken.de (drew.ipv6.franken.de [IPv6:2001:638:a02:a001:20e:cff:fe4a:feaa]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88B1E1B289C for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 12:51:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.200] (p54819C6D.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.129.156.109]) (Authenticated sender: macmic) by mail-n.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08CCC1C104925; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 21:51:31 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
In-Reply-To: <53B90103.7010907@nteczone.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 21:51:08 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CC0D3CBA-AFBB-4E92-8F53-CFAEED03AAC6@lurchi.franken.de>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D35B976@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>, <A02215DA-CAE9-4D31-A70C-8829083D3DA1@lurchi.franken.de> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D35CD5E@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <53A7BF3E.8010505@nteczone.com> <F1115DA9-27C4-4D19-9CD3-7B86736F9566@lurchi.franken.de> <53B90103.7010907@nteczone.com>
To: Christian Groves <Christian.Groves@NTECZONE.COM>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/DHZOtPHNq2DJ_WoKVyTowiTXlVY
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] WGLC for data channel drafts - sub-protocol usage
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 19:51:37 -0000
On 06 Jul 2014, at 09:55, Christian Groves <Christian.Groves@NTECZONE.COM> wrote: > The definition of Token is ASCII not UTF-8. OK, I can change it to ASCII. Any objections? Best regards Michael > > Christian > > On 5/07/2014 3:23 AM, Michael Tuexen wrote: >> On 23 Jun 2014, at 07:46, Christian Groves <Christian.Groves@NTECZONE.COM> wrote: >> >>> Do you need that statement? >> I guess formally you don't. But having it make it simpler for the reader... >> >> Best regards >> Michael >>> [RFC6455] section 11.5 says: >>> >>> Subprotocol Identifier >>> The identifier of the subprotocol, as will be used in the >>> |Sec-WebSocket-Protocol| header field registered in Section 11.3.4 >>> of this specification. The value must conform to the requirements >>> given in item 10 of Section 4.1 of this specification -- namely, >>> the value must be a token as defined by RFC 2616 [RFC2616]. >>> >>> "Token" is RFC2616 is defined as: >>> CHAR = <any US-ASCII character (octets 0 - 127)> >>> token = 1*<any CHAR except CTLs or separators> >>> >>> Regards, Christian >>> >>> On 12/06/2014 3:24 AM, Christer Holmberg wrote: >>>> Hi Michael, >>>> >>>> I agree that we need to keep text about the encoding. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Christer >>>> >>>> ________________________________________ >>>> From: Michael Tuexen [Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de] >>>> Sent: Wednesday, 11 June 2014 5:28 PM >>>> To: Christer Holmberg >>>> Cc: Ted Hardie; rtcweb@ietf.org >>>> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] WGLC for data channel drafts - sub-protocol usage >>>> >>>> On 10 Jun 2014, at 21:22, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> A comment on draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-06: >>>>> >>>>> Section 5.1 says: >>>>> >>>>> "Protocol: Variable Length (sequence of characters) >>>>> The sub-protocol for the channel as a UTF-8 encoded string. If >>>>> this is an empty string the protocol is unspecified. If it is a >>>>> non-empty string, it specifies an protocol registered in the >>>>> 'WebSocket Subprotocol Name Registry' created in [RFC6455]." >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I think "The sub-protocol for the channel as a UTF-8 encoded string." part is a little confusing, because there is no such thing as sub-protocol in DCEP itself (DCEP only uses the WebSocket sub-protocol registry for registering DCEP *protocol* values). >>>>> >>>>> Perhaps we could just remove the sentence, and keep: >>>>> >>>>> "Protocol: Variable Length (sequence of characters) >>>>> If this is an empty string the protocol is unspecified. If it is a >>>>> non-empty string, it specifies an protocol registered in the >>>>> 'WebSocket Subprotocol Name Registry' created in [RFC6455]." >>>>> >>>>> Section 4 gives more information about the usage of the protocol. >>>> Do you intend to drop the statement about the UTF-8 encoding? >>>> I think we should keep a statement about the encoding. >>>> >>>> Best regards >>>> Michael >>>>> (Alternatively, we could use sub-protocol terminology also in DCEP) >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Christer >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> From: rtcweb [rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of Ted Hardie [ted.ietf@gmail.com] >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, 10 June, 2014 9:52 PM >>>>> To: rtcweb@ietf.org >>>>> Subject: [rtcweb] WGLC for data channel drafts >>>>> >>>>> Dear WG, >>>>> >>>>> This starts a working group last call for our core Data Channel drafts: >>>>> >>>>> draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol-06.txt >>>>> draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-channel-10.txt >>>>> >>>>> Please review them in detail, especially for areas which may be of concern to the broader IETF community. This WGLC will end on June 27, 2014. >>>>> >>>>> Ted, Sean, Cullen >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> rtcweb mailing list >>>>> rtcweb@ietf.org >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> rtcweb mailing list >>>> rtcweb@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rtcweb mailing list >>> rtcweb@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb >>> >> > >
- Re: [rtcweb] WGLC for data channel drafts - sub-p… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] WGLC for data channel drafts - sub-p… Michael Tuexen
- Re: [rtcweb] WGLC for data channel drafts - sub-p… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] WGLC for data channel drafts - sub-p… Christian Groves
- Re: [rtcweb] WGLC for data channel drafts - sub-p… Michael Tuexen
- Re: [rtcweb] WGLC for data channel drafts - sub-p… Michael Tuexen
- Re: [rtcweb] WGLC for data channel drafts - sub-p… Christian Groves
- Re: [rtcweb] WGLC for data channel drafts - sub-p… Michael Tuexen