IETF Logo Mail Archive

[rtcweb] ICE-Mismatch and WebRTC

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Mon, 07 July 2014 19:48 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4525D1B28C9 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 12:48:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kbdlTGqODjHg for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 12:48:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-f43.google.com (mail-wg0-f43.google.com [74.125.82.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AA921B28B8 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 12:48:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id b13so4850761wgh.26 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Jul 2014 12:48:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=dz+n920rZZT3ndbjogoRE42vPmr3mabH7x6u8oXXZy4=; b=aDP0JbYaNITfGtKG/OGORJQc6EG4o5+zkWgTVDaC0eVU5pWuf1abU1JCD9xnsOrCQB 4OX1GBxtfdqWa7o8uWlGLVLWvDJs049cyv8gEieHmMxqnuug2wk6oCPlPOODVrwCT504 da3YREpfJDV2IfxTjoH12wBUTs2WrRUQcwJkx80nd0l6gTkLKcc/ue0HSnStvEIYxK4E bAFckCgSu3fIgT2V4V+iZ1hmDNIC2xr6uLwEOJTn42LfNdOzAVIvgwquQVIq9qM2x8uf t1lDtA0OWMyGOxqIwe1x3n8SOMBo5aiuv79WyoN0wZOhjBPBRG4PD+IsJylYGi49rEAy t3Ag==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnqyOpRryW3OEBKPEl41fQudFZSAtbtF8jQbdmyzbYwHDi5iwnJ8ZIu3XI7kmyMExqRxaEY
X-Received: by 10.194.216.196 with SMTP id os4mr28165911wjc.70.1404762521844; Mon, 07 Jul 2014 12:48:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com (mail-wi0-f176.google.com [209.85.212.176]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ft2sm109506562wib.1.2014.07.07.12.48.40 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 07 Jul 2014 12:48:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id n3so16640186wiv.15 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 07 Jul 2014 12:48:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.74.9 with SMTP id p9mr39380398wiv.39.1404762520691; Mon, 07 Jul 2014 12:48:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.217.131.17 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 12:48:40 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 15:48:40 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxvGcq+hZ5vQLyq4OS2wHTdYiKYpm4+ntaKdqLMBu84SYw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d043c81aa0a2d2204fd9fc354"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/Cy9m2FSPS9oW6YYm2HntPIaok-s
Subject: [rtcweb] ICE-Mismatch and WebRTC
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 19:48:44 -0000

Is it possible to run into ICE-Mismatch with WebRTC? Should we specify that
default candidate (c= and m= line based candidate) should be ignored and
thus mismatch check should not be performed?
_____________
Roman Shpount

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email