IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] ICE-Mismatch and WebRTC

Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> Sat, 12 July 2014 15:28 UTC

Return-Path: <juberti@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BA4A1B2B0F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Jul 2014 08:28:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.029
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.029 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qg0XwC7lGBiJ for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Jul 2014 08:28:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-x22f.google.com (mail-vc0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F20D51B2914 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Jul 2014 08:28:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id hy4so4349536vcb.34 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Jul 2014 08:28:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=4Wdt/r4TBCC4uOJjOq2Q7r86yTs5aClfNwtJUo+qcpw=; b=NeYTiAR7+7XG3EMmQyyawWrweqOfiXBJCGS/5WflI3ifdPc+fE4xhH2YkC3VjQ0w0w jNtZPe8D2POjHqELuQSJtCylM407c8Xx56Ai5VFGY1hETBomaVuhaBxl/S7oGusEx9TG 1hiOGJ97YnCIwXDI0NM8XzFQH1OpiOwmgNMHM3xsEqWgsfYyFyhTknVOpYp8K5ovvWB4 Wl/uz86ESnCkybhCZa1TAUesW5P5OM7YsMCDWgPQ9h+XVsat44ZIIaAZrdM84Jr7tPKo 4kllYPxc4z5TzrrExISo25MU+EZxJRwYJCq+lulbQSHpNQy0b3Us99+gtkwA2GrCSnXn MgsA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=4Wdt/r4TBCC4uOJjOq2Q7r86yTs5aClfNwtJUo+qcpw=; b=AM2oySlr8i4YNM52B004rNCtp2t6KDRhXmFAEYzJ5tJPOV5RAt/OI0EpCGR4jICWUp 69HerT8rtUZ+h2HIug2iGUiubmH65VPryK3CN+esLqzVD7uYjx4hgG6vlBDsWSFSJodw N6fcHsdPt8voFAes4Pjz+Ff0iUC6Sfu6mSRXqwvEFbiRAp4Q7ynPhCCVt+4dnfy3g1dO JEYb6qjjTISCNVORQ3wnTbGxDUZTf6OKdNYhyZut8EzadLovoIum6MCetC/O+rme0IPm joPmtPL3u3rz6FUaA5biczNljDtT/2ksXn0378r4gQF6u9kd+YVYNO77qJCc/VVtKTBO RJ+g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkZxQndLN3j9MtlgmtECR0yn6UGOcQ+lpAdjSIZqDisMBRFpbEGuan84atV0ZB3Jw1Kfpzy
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.58.212.66 with SMTP id ni2mr5952324vec.12.1405178891813; Sat, 12 Jul 2014 08:28:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.27.8 with HTTP; Sat, 12 Jul 2014 08:28:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.27.8 with HTTP; Sat, 12 Jul 2014 08:28:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAD5OKxtuxE6O77j4tqdBCqa9nkkOmVg-t=Du_1jqiVX0nJC4uA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAD5OKxvGcq+hZ5vQLyq4OS2wHTdYiKYpm4+ntaKdqLMBu84SYw@mail.gmail.com> <53BC1D53.4080904@jitsi.org> <CAD5OKxsWEkDGTvidUGcRi2AzWjmCnqXwoQtBn7-f5PzEzrNL2A@mail.gmail.com> <CAPvvaa+zA_n_U_1iBC0=wRPJG4pf-SEv8Ni0fZNGPXt4Byj2Bw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-2-zx=V1Nc7TwKp444M19NQqdej0K4COd=V8aHpEQhXrg@mail.gmail.com> <53C02268.9030109@jitsi.org> <CAOJ7v-3dbs=WO-nELsA8o9pFoTgx+D1XKPZWdX9QuNr5eQNuAQ@mail.gmail.com> <53C047A4.9000706@jitsi.org> <CAD5OKxtuxE6O77j4tqdBCqa9nkkOmVg-t=Du_1jqiVX0nJC4uA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 08:28:10 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-2sPiApHM34xxbPUt5=nb2LugQZ-mzoAYKW5qd3_t=8GA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
To: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7bd6c0a2b162f204fe00b4c9"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/UQr4-qM-qZrsCL-qVTwz5y6yO4k
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] ICE-Mismatch and WebRTC
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2014 15:28:14 -0000

Agreed, with a special case for the no-candidates trickle ICE situation.
On Jul 11, 2014 5:20 PM, "Roman Shpount" <roman@telurix.com> wrote:

> I would agree with:
>
> 1. Must fail if c=/m= line IP does not match any candidate. Must also fail
> if rtcp attribute does not match any RTCP candidates.
>
> 2. Must fail if "ice-mismatch" attribute is present same as no ICE
>
> 3. Port 0 in m= line to disable the line must be understood
>
> 4. c= line with 0.0.0.0 must fail
>
> Does this make sense?
> _____________
> Roman Shpount
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email