IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] ICE-Mismatch and WebRTC

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Fri, 11 July 2014 21:20 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B3901B29BB for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 14:20:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LfGNpQOnHKhW for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 14:20:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-f53.google.com (mail-qg0-f53.google.com [209.85.192.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EBF21B29B8 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 14:20:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id i50so1471913qgf.40 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 14:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=LKBAdDNrmMiv7DHiePnZk9G2fyZ49OE4BRdi3oQbT0k=; b=Qh8xsc6leh4fAdygixD61B3eiMBHCg6ccIipoKLRPqdZjgnG3KOySnj0tXohDZ/Gyt dhipaDVst13WuAv6E1RJBplUpQWHePxlGLcU/xNtPx/66V0nkrwgTL5w515AH1E5xLLx J6iyQHBWtgN/L3SeHEUcRt8HcoCzkgDvBbWoCCEwEZab1t0IZNcdB7AscbKoALxBq1Gn +h8zs+v/dXg4DXJV94rodu3mYdm7E0aCk5qr6k+hqNyIZi/5kLaAeuepStfbNSx2O4xv +bVD3dFUJGIzvn+DSik6/cxlz+v29x9U2AGq64W2cqLRBWakHCliQfJQIxe/JVKhncO2 ZolQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkVMhjwsrbxRKnpJ3MwV/TKSnB4QIFXWQuNwom6hUuFZPLCYCYB79Vqt6INb5gZQxHuRio2
X-Received: by 10.140.87.236 with SMTP id r99mr2458364qgd.43.1405113648515; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 14:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-f49.google.com (mail-qa0-f49.google.com [209.85.216.49]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b49sm3422946qgb.27.2014.07.11.14.20.46 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 11 Jul 2014 14:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id dc16so1342354qab.8 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 14:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.85.101 with SMTP id m92mr2698706qgd.26.1405113646145; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 14:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.96.210.37 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 14:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <53C047A4.9000706@jitsi.org>
References: <CAD5OKxvGcq+hZ5vQLyq4OS2wHTdYiKYpm4+ntaKdqLMBu84SYw@mail.gmail.com> <53BC1D53.4080904@jitsi.org> <CAD5OKxsWEkDGTvidUGcRi2AzWjmCnqXwoQtBn7-f5PzEzrNL2A@mail.gmail.com> <CAPvvaa+zA_n_U_1iBC0=wRPJG4pf-SEv8Ni0fZNGPXt4Byj2Bw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-2-zx=V1Nc7TwKp444M19NQqdej0K4COd=V8aHpEQhXrg@mail.gmail.com> <53C02268.9030109@jitsi.org> <CAOJ7v-3dbs=WO-nELsA8o9pFoTgx+D1XKPZWdX9QuNr5eQNuAQ@mail.gmail.com> <53C047A4.9000706@jitsi.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 17:20:46 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxtuxE6O77j4tqdBCqa9nkkOmVg-t=Du_1jqiVX0nJC4uA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
To: Emil Ivov <emcho@jitsi.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c155eabf698404fdf183dd"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/DznEjat8GTYqmyhQUz4vEa6NMA0
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] ICE-Mismatch and WebRTC
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 21:20:51 -0000

I would agree with:

1. Must fail if c=/m= line IP does not match any candidate. Must also fail
if rtcp attribute does not match any RTCP candidates.

2. Must fail if "ice-mismatch" attribute is present same as no ICE

3. Port 0 in m= line to disable the line must be understood

4. c= line with 0.0.0.0 must fail

Does this make sense?
_____________
Roman Shpount

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email