IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for Screen/Application/Desktop sharing

"Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterriberry@mozilla.com> Mon, 19 September 2011 14:18 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=236d0731c=tterriberry@mozilla.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A2621F8C1D for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 07:18:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.193
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.193 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.114, BAYES_00=-2.599, MISSING_HEADERS=1.292]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kdq9H+wPRHUq for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 07:18:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxip3i.isis.unc.edu (mxip3i.isis.unc.edu [152.2.2.195]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A95E621F8C19 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 07:18:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ap4EALlPd06sGgRa/2dsb2JhbABCpkKBWoFTAQEEAR0bQAEQCyEWDwkDAgECAUUTAQcCBYduBLU8hngEh2+QZRKMMA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,551,1309752000"; d="scan'208";a="184732466"
Received: from mr2a.isis.unc.edu (HELO smtp.unc.edu) ([172.26.4.90]) by mxip3o.isis.unc.edu with ESMTP; 19 Sep 2011 10:20:53 -0400
X-UNC-Auth-As: tterribe
X-UNC-Auth-IP: 69.181.137.38
Received: from [172.17.0.5] (c-69-181-137-38.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [69.181.137.38]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.unc.edu (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p8JEKpLJ011582 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:20:53 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4E774FC3.3000806@mozilla.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 07:20:51 -0700
From: "Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterriberry@mozilla.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101120 Gentoo/2.0.10 SeaMonkey/2.0.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <4E76E8E8.2050102@ericsson.com> <017078EC-3E1A-4CC4-A29F-51B569474416@acmepacket.com> <4E774B34.1090605@jesup.org>
In-Reply-To: <4E774B34.1090605@jesup.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Call for Consensus on Use Case for Screen/Application/Desktop sharing
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 14:18:58 -0000

>> browser into VNC. Was there discussion on the con call about what IT
>> department types would think of these two scenarios?
>
> To be honest, no, it wasn't discussed, and it very much should be. This

The issue of "what will the enterprise think" has certainly been raised 
before on this list (albeit in slightly different contexts). See, e.g., 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg00768.html

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email