Re: [rtcweb] New Milestones for RTCWEB WG

Stefan Håkansson LK <> Thu, 04 August 2011 08:07 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 875E121F850C for <>; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 01:07:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.24
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.24 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.059, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Axx8A0rcWl4m for <>; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 01:07:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF92D21F8507 for <>; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 01:07:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3d-b7c17ae00000262e-51-4e3a53479bdc
Received: from (Unknown_Domain []) by (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 98.C0.09774.7435A3E4; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 10:07:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 10:07:35 +0200
From: Stefan Håkansson LK <>
To: Magnus Westerlund <>, "" <>
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 10:07:35 +0200
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] New Milestones for RTCWEB WG
Thread-Index: AcxRDhU9WJHLuA1iTWaZf4MWcOVhDwBbo7ZM
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] New Milestones for RTCWEB WG
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 08:07:23 -0000

As one of the webrtc chairs I have the generic comment that the sooner information is available the better. In particular, webrtc is planning a f2f meeting at the W3C TPAC (Oct 31 and Nov 1). To get the most out of that meeting it would be good if the Use Cases and Sec/Priv documents are available, and if there can be some advance info on what reqs the "current solution" has on the API(s) by then.

From: [] On Behalf Of Magnus Westerlund []
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 2:16 PM
Subject: [rtcweb] New Milestones for RTCWEB WG


As raised in the WG meeting last week we plan to submit new milestones.
These is to make the time line a bit more realistic to actually be meet.
They also try to adjust to the picked document structure.

Here they are:
Oct 2011 Send Use Cases (draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements),
Overview (draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview), Security and Privacy Documents
(I-D) to W3C

Dec 2011 Send Use Cases (draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements)
document to IESG for publication as Informational

Apr 2012 Send W3C input on what requirements the current solution has on

May 2012 Send Overview (draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview), Security and
Privacy Model documents to IESG for publication as Informational

May 2012 Send Signalling and Negotiation, and NAT Traversal to IESG for
publication as Proposed Standard

Jun 2012 Send Media Transport, Media Processing, and Codecs to IESG for
publication as Proposed Standard

Jun 2012 Send Datagram Transport for non-media data to IESG for
publication as Proposed Standard

These will soon be submitted for official publication. If you have any
issues please raise them on the list and we can discuss them.


Magnus Westerlund

Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
Färögatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto:

rtcweb mailing list