Re: [rtcweb] New Milestones for RTCWEB WG

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Mon, 08 August 2011 12:55 UTC

Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58B5621F8AED for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 05:55:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uYUJLS05Iw-f for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 05:55:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73B4F21F89B8 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 05:55:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD5D39E0F5; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 14:54:31 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bq0hWliu7Zz8; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 14:54:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from hta-dell.lul.corp.google.com (unknown [62.20.124.50]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE55639E0BC; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 14:54:29 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4E3FDCCB.1060700@alvestrand.no>
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 14:55:39 +0200
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Parthasarathi R (partr)" <partr@cisco.com>
References: <4E37EAAB.3020708@ericsson.com> <A11921905DA1564D9BCF64A6430A62390608E48C@XMB-BGL-411.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <A11921905DA1564D9BCF64A6430A62390608E48C@XMB-BGL-411.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] New Milestones for RTCWEB WG
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 12:55:17 -0000

On 08/03/11 14:12, Parthasarathi R (partr) wrote:
> Hi Magnus,
>
> The current RTCWeb overview, usecase&  requirement document does not have architecture diagrams. Please clarify which one of the RTCWeb WG item below will cover RTCWeb architecture.
If draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview does not describe the architecture in 
sufficient detail, it needs updating. It is the document in the document 
hierarchy that should have this role.

Some parts of it are not explicit because no consensus has been 
forthcoming, others because I have not understood yet what people need 
to hear.

What do you think it should say?
> Thanks
> Partha
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org
>> [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Magnus Westerlund
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 5:47 PM
>> To: rtcweb@ietf.org
>> Subject: [rtcweb] New Milestones for RTCWEB WG
>>
>> WG,
>>
>> As raised in the WG meeting last week we plan to submit new
>> milestones.
>> These is to make the time line a bit more realistic to
>> actually be meet.
>> They also try to adjust to the picked document structure.
>>
>> Here they are:
>> Oct 2011 Send Use Cases
>> (draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements),
>> Overview (draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview), Security and Privacy Documents
>> (I-D) to W3C
>>
>> Dec 2011 Send Use Cases (draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements)
>> document to IESG for publication as Informational
>>
>> Apr 2012 Send W3C input on what requirements the current
>> solution has on
>> API(s)
>>
>> May 2012 Send Overview (draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview), Security
>> and Privacy Model documents to IESG for publication as Informational
>>
>> May 2012 Send Signalling and Negotiation, and NAT Traversal
>> to IESG for publication as Proposed Standard
>>
>> Jun 2012 Send Media Transport, Media Processing, and Codecs
>> to IESG for publication as Proposed Standard
>>
>> Jun 2012 Send Datagram Transport for non-media data to IESG
>> for publication as Proposed Standard
>>
>> These will soon be submitted for official publication. If you
>> have any issues please raise them on the list and we can discuss them.
>>
>> cheers
>>
>> Magnus Westerlund
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Ericsson AB                | Phone  +46 10 7148287
>> Färögatan 6                | Mobile +46 73 0949079
>> SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>