Re: [rtcweb] #25: Section 5.1 Conferencing Extensions
Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> Fri, 30 August 2013 01:24 UTC
Return-Path: <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49A1811E8129 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 18:24:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.485
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.485 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.113, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kH-BftpyOQ67 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 18:24:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blu0-omc2-s12.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc2-s12.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.87]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ECB611E80D3 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 18:24:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLU169-W50 ([65.55.111.72]) by blu0-omc2-s12.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 29 Aug 2013 18:24:18 -0700
X-TMN: [w0H7upBFeACVL04xNVFiUuxU3KNoXgDE]
X-Originating-Email: [bernard_aboba@hotmail.com]
Message-ID: <BLU169-W5087D785E8D0A5818CEB4693350@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_30cac856-6be9-4c47-b44e-4dc8272be9e6_"
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
To: Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 18:24:17 -0700
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <2783C5E7-1743-4C59-A943-9A92C9C69CBA@csperkins.org>
References: <066.c4782f9f452cb0c5049d3712dcfdcda1@trac.tools.ietf.org> <329CDAE3-283C-4543-AADA-00D3A1D6E6AB@csperkins.org> <BLU169-W105CC7D0FA6DAF024BE05C293490@phx.gbl> <521C4510.6000402@ericsson.com> <BLU404-EAS16960AA2A3F55D238F01AD9934A0@phx.gbl>, <2783C5E7-1743-4C59-A943-9A92C9C69CBA@csperkins.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Aug 2013 01:24:18.0208 (UTC) FILETIME=[A5A70A00:01CEA51F]
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] #25: Section 5.1 Conferencing Extensions
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 01:24:24 -0000
Colin said: "The draft does discuss both those issues, in Sections 5.1.6 and 7.1. Can you say what you think is missing from those?" [BA] My issue wasn't really with Sections 5.1.6 and 7.1 (or with the TMMBR mandate). It was with the text in Section 5.1, which seems to contradict the reasoning for mandating TMMBR. As Magnus noted, TMMBR needs to be implemented to support congestion and flow control, which makes it more than just a performance concern. That puts it in a different category from FIR, for example.
- [rtcweb] #25: Section 5.1 Conferencing Extensions rtcweb issue tracker
- Re: [rtcweb] #25: Section 5.1 Conferencing Extens… Colin Perkins
- Re: [rtcweb] #25: Section 5.1 Conferencing Extens… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] #25: Section 5.1 Conferencing Extens… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [rtcweb] #25: Section 5.1 Conferencing Extens… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] #25: Section 5.1 Conferencing Extens… Colin Perkins
- Re: [rtcweb] #25: Section 5.1 Conferencing Extens… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [rtcweb] #25: Section 5.1 Conferencing Extens… rtcweb issue tracker