Re: [rtcweb] draft-jesup-rtp-congestion-reqs-00.txt: Requirements for RTP congestion control
"James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com> Mon, 05 March 2012 07:01 UTC
Return-Path: <jmpolk@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E866D21F8594 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 23:01:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.774, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K6zNkwcj6cGD for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 23:01:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mtv-iport-1.cisco.com (mtv-iport-1.cisco.com [173.36.130.12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA9F21F8593 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 23:01:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=jmpolk@cisco.com; l=3317; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1330930890; x=1332140490; h=message-id:date:to:from:subject:cc:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=05+t2zBY2mgUk93T0Vz9lJgPpVuExydpnOHRR+b0CSw=; b=mRidMFoB+u3mZM0/b8RZoYrKSaP1nLcxVGsDFtmk0qaYvLw8t75A+VwY q1hjSSrfLq+CFKjY5STvDi5+wA7QT8T/uSvUPKqynOSkEds3I9UGQh0bU F09mlZqPlOJajqowzb4nurV3xm5ZSinLnEFQVm3SzSSz/mvCtZRNiVR3l Q=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,532,1325462400"; d="scan'208";a="31907363"
Received: from mtv-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.58.9]) by mtv-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Mar 2012 07:01:29 +0000
Received: from jmpolk-wxp01.cisco.com (rcdn-jmpolk-8711.cisco.com [10.99.80.18]) by mtv-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q2571SVT030459; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 07:01:28 GMT
Message-Id: <201203050701.q2571SVT030459@mtv-core-4.cisco.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 01:01:27 -0600
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
From: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F544FEF.6060702@alvestrand.no>
References: <4F53E513.40002@alvestrand.no> <201203042216.q24MGfal019061@mtv-core-2.cisco.com> <4F544FEF.6060702@alvestrand.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] draft-jesup-rtp-congestion-reqs-00.txt: Requirements for RTP congestion control
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 07:01:31 -0000
At 11:32 PM 3/4/2012, Harald Alvestrand wrote: >On 03/04/2012 11:16 PM, James M. Polk wrote: >>Harald >> >>Which of these two is expected to be the conflict with rtp-congestion hour? >Thanks for the pointer to the conflict - I'll pass along to the ICCRG chairs. >> >>TUESDAY, March 27, 2012 >> >>1500-1520 Beverage and Snack Break I - Hall Maillot A >>1520-1700 Afternoon Session II >>252A IRTF iccrg Internet >>Congestion Control Research Group >>Maillot RAI avtext Audio/Video Transport Extensions WG >>253 RAI vipr >>Verification Involving PSTN Reachability WG >> >>1710-1810 Afternoon Session III >>252A IRTF iccrg Internet >>Congestion Control Research Group >>252B RAI sipcore Session Initiation Protocol Core WG >> >>I vote for Session II, but that's just one voice. >I think so too. I don't know of RTCWEB related material in either session. fair - but you know there are a LOT of SIP heads in RTCWEB... James >>Since most of us aren't part of the ICCRG >>mailing list, can you ask and pass along which >>session the rtp-congestion hour long discussion will be in? Thanks > >Will do. > >> >>BTW - there already is no TSV conflict during either timeslot. >> >>James >> >>At 03:56 PM 3/4/2012, Harald Alvestrand wrote: >>>For the WG's interest. >>>This (among other inputs) will be discussed in >>>the IRTF ICCRG WG on Tuesday in Paris. >>> >>>Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Harald >>> >>>-------- Original Message -------- >>>Subject: New Version Notification for draft-jesup-rtp-congestion-reqs-00.txt >>>Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 06:19:29 -0800 >>>From: <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>internet-drafts@ietf.org >>>To: <mailto:harald@alvestrand.no>harald@alvestrand.no >>>CC: <mailto:randell-ietf@jesup.org>randell-ietf@jesup.org >>> >>> >>> >>>A new version of I-D, >>>draft-jesup-rtp-congestion-reqs-00.txt has >>>been successfully submitted by Harald >>>Alvestrand and posted to the IETF repository. >>> >>>Filename: draft-jesup-rtp-congestion-reqs >>>Revision: 00 >>>Title: Congestion Control Requirements For Real Time Media >>>Creation date: 2012-03-04 >>>WG ID: Individual Submission >>>Number of pages: 7 >>> >>>Abstract: >>> Congestion control is needed for all data transported across the >>> Internet, in order to promote fair usage and prevent congestion >>> collapse. The requirements for interactive, point-to-point real time >>> multimedia, which needs by low-delay, semi-reliable data delivery, >>> are different from the requirements for bulk transfer like FTP or >>> bursty transfers like Web pages, and the TCP algorithms are not >>> suitable for this traffic. >>> >>> This document attempts to describe a set of requirements that can be >>> used to evaluate other congestion control mechanisms in order to >>> figure out their fitness for this purpose. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>The IETF Secretariat >>> >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>rtcweb mailing list >>>rtcweb@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb >>
- Re: [rtcweb] draft-jesup-rtp-congestion-reqs-00.t… Harald Alvestrand
- [rtcweb] draft-jesup-rtp-congestion-reqs-00.txt: … Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] draft-jesup-rtp-congestion-reqs-00.t… James M. Polk
- Re: [rtcweb] draft-jesup-rtp-congestion-reqs-00.t… James M. Polk