Re: [rtcweb] draft-jesup-rtp-congestion-reqs-00.txt: Requirements for RTP congestion control

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Mon, 05 March 2012 05:32 UTC

Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA47C21F8613 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 21:32:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.297
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.297 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.074, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0u1M3p297BS3 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 21:32:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1781921F8646 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 21:32:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E34339E0D2; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 06:32:30 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eikenes.alvestrand.no
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1CqLqLu+-Bxy; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 06:32:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.11.107] (c213-89-143-9.bredband.comhem.se [213.89.143.9]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31C8739E088; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 06:32:29 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4F544FEF.6060702@alvestrand.no>
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 06:32:31 +0100
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.27) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/3.1.19
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
References: <4F53E513.40002@alvestrand.no> <201203042216.q24MGfal019061@mtv-core-2.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <201203042216.q24MGfal019061@mtv-core-2.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] draft-jesup-rtp-congestion-reqs-00.txt: Requirements for RTP congestion control
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 05:32:33 -0000

On 03/04/2012 11:16 PM, James M. Polk wrote:
> Harald
>
> Which of these two is expected to be the conflict with rtp-congestion 
> hour?
Thanks for the pointer to the conflict - I'll pass along to the ICCRG 
chairs.
>
> TUESDAY, March 27, 2012
>
> 1500-1520  Beverage and Snack Break I - Hall Maillot A
> 1520-1700  Afternoon Session II
> 252A                    IRTF    iccrg Internet Congestion Control 
> Research Group
> Maillot                 RAI     avtext Audio/Video Transport 
> Extensions WG
> 253                     RAI     vipr Verification Involving PSTN 
> Reachability WG
>
> 1710-1810  Afternoon Session III
> 252A                    IRTF    iccrg Internet Congestion Control 
> Research Group
> 252B                    RAI     sipcore Session Initiation Protocol 
> Core WG
>
> I vote for Session II, but that's just one voice.
I think so too. I don't know of RTCWEB related material in either session.

>
> Since most of us aren't part of the ICCRG mailing list, can you ask 
> and pass along which session the rtp-congestion hour long discussion 
> will be in? Thanks

Will do.

>
> BTW - there already is no TSV conflict during either timeslot.
>
> James
>
> At 03:56 PM 3/4/2012, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
>> For the WG's interest.
>> This (among other inputs) will be discussed in the IRTF ICCRG WG on 
>> Tuesday in Paris.
>>
>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â  Harald
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: New Version Notification for 
>> draft-jesup-rtp-congestion-reqs-00.txt
>> Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 06:19:29 -0800
>> From: <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>internet-drafts@ietf.org
>> To: <mailto:harald@alvestrand.no>harald@alvestrand.no
>> CC: <mailto:randell-ietf@jesup.org>randell-ietf@jesup.org
>>
>>
>>
>> A new version of I-D, draft-jesup-rtp-congestion-reqs-00.txt has been 
>> successfully submitted by Harald Alvestrand and posted to the IETF 
>> repository.
>>
>> Filename:        draft-jesup-rtp-congestion-reqs
>> Revision:        00
>> Title:           Congestion Control Requirements For Real Time Media
>> Creation date:   2012-03-04
>> WG ID:           Individual Submission
>> Number of pages: 7
>>
>> Abstract:
>>    Congestion control is needed for all data transported across the
>>    Internet, in order to promote fair usage and prevent congestion
>>    collapse.  The requirements for interactive, point-to-point real time
>>    multimedia, which needs by low-delay, semi-reliable data delivery,
>>    are different from the requirements for bulk transfer like FTP or
>>    bursty transfers like Web pages, and the TCP algorithms are not
>>    suitable for this traffic.
>>
>>    This document attempts to describe a set of requirements that can be
>>    used to evaluate other congestion control mechanisms in order to
>>    figure out their fitness for this purpose.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The IETF Secretariat
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>