Re: [rtcweb] Call for comment on document split

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com> Fri, 17 June 2011 17:13 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3455621F84A8 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:13:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AWvSGDae0ksR for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:13:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7479321F84A7 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:13:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fluffy@cisco.com; l=1179; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1308330786; x=1309540386; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ofFIvBmuF80UtjMMQxTB/vECDnPs5woFLHKnGLqF3ow=; b=ccyRTiIuqTZM87cLkG7gFpHIPlfg7/dfUgBEwV2p07QloVSQGI1U5Vqh /XOUvvECcdb3b/Sc+BPQu2Dd2bLueLaefwC+/yiO+0Ltn38IK762QCUKQ Uq+xiNzNGnzKsRxO7ah4TJhe2c5tatpNs2R9dXR9owfZz8t7B98OPsAbC Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAH6K+02rRDoJ/2dsb2JhbABSplB3iHOgap4PhicEhyCKPoRfiz0
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,382,1304294400"; d="scan'208";a="715929736"
Received: from mtv-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.58.9]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Jun 2011 17:13:04 +0000
Received: from [192.168.4.100] (rcdn-fluffy-8712.cisco.com [10.99.9.19]) by mtv-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p5HHD3rA028756; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:13:03 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinu402NoPovU6nDWAKKUBKfbJyk3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:13:02 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <72DF99A5-5684-4507-B25A-C83A1AA2F042@cisco.com>
References: <BANLkTinu402NoPovU6nDWAKKUBKfbJyk3Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Hardie <hardie@ipinfusion.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Call for comment on document split
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:13:07 -0000

On Jun 16, 2011, at 10:30 PM, Ted Hardie wrote:

> Hi Folks,
> 
> In order to allow folks time to submit draft-ietf-rtcweb versions in time for the upcoming 00 deadline, the chairs would like to first outline our theory of the document splits to meet our chartered milestones (to refresh you self on them: http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/rtcweb/charter/) in the August time frame.
> 
> We'd like to have one document which describes the use cases.
> We'd like to have one document that gives a system overview and outlines the overall model.
> We'd like to have one document that describes the privacy and security model.
> We'd like to have one document that  describes the connectivity model (for NAT traversal etc.).
> 
> Later documents will be: signaling and negotiation methods, media transports, datagram transport for non-media data, and one or more documents on media processing and codecs.

With my individual contributor hat on ... 

I don't see the reason to wait for "later" on these other docs.  I think some of them are as ready now as the connectivity model stuff is. Let's get moving with this stuff.