Re: [rtcweb] Review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-mdns-ice-candidates

Lennart Grahl <lennart.grahl@gmail.com> Sat, 29 September 2018 10:25 UTC

Return-Path: <lennart.grahl@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D16DA130E08 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 03:25:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I7UrxiSabAni for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 03:25:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x432.google.com (mail-wr1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::432]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0CA4130DFD for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 03:25:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x432.google.com with SMTP id j8-v6so8834559wrw.5 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 03:25:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:references:from:openpgp:autocrypt:to:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5xsysozod5YidSXoRpBcshd29MtW9MRCmP1S71nnkNo=; b=et+6qur6xVzymZLjTqaYBSbYxax/TpDQrypYTrKkWwENvT+ycbtJmnkHNa7tXl/UqX 1pXcE4T5fI1EG33JpPWdEE7Y7KsvW/iIaQ355e2cwhQERcFCxNUCgQ+lOJVxQEy8948F QQpGHpYLFpX6/b8MFqk2m0HfupQ9NG//WMh6LOqlZI/V7dvI6IKsZmxdfeP51R0FEv32 lI+PSnzQwB34PT39wr52ugh05Yzcmv2q957e5tAXglqPKYfOq6B+B5wb0eFOxrs9y4tr pdKWWn5ue1wwiEqUhFGTkSEgWYNnJnnbVqkocljRofAxnotcaAYlbfGeKzD8sTt/xeTb eXBA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:references:from:openpgp:autocrypt:to :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5xsysozod5YidSXoRpBcshd29MtW9MRCmP1S71nnkNo=; b=rStWMY/qfNq0B7MeVirv/bbsE9iWjc7YARrBkkarALau7G4o0ziR3I3n09OU452BaK O+Jy+VQ1X+m5sGTIjpH78t6p9OooTVS25Jba88ZglBULpwuDicumI3TYZq4GnWGZMlJD csYZ2uXgaj9EVY/AOin7y9U3rDSURjAJg2SG0nt3Pk7iWQ3VgiyAnuZfc4J8T0e1DAp6 bU4fDhBWPNk8ez19+9/XBzQ5JnkKb5P9MY2JwDOeYxR6pu+mtP21P2CoRLIoPXfIultw gYga/zAxlsAkyf1e7h9ujUFr4tWBD2kfVAfqK68pS+QtDrF1yXaafi70I2oYpaLOclrH sPEg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfogjuv0RSX8bvSPkKrrL6p9+5/DvuKw8Kxp0BnJHOEaFDFywlC0x wR1abWKkIAg/ve6lQvPZq71u2S69
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV62Y4a/EwTskxUW2QhLYz72Y1m1kHppk7a0w4NtVCr0OGpZxtY13nlfPdnC0xnwQ30AWZprc7g==
X-Received: by 2002:adf:e50b:: with SMTP id j11-v6mr1566586wrm.111.1538216731811; Sat, 29 Sep 2018 03:25:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.26.2.1] ([31.10.151.172]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v6-v6sm3296547wmc.43.2018.09.29.03.25.30 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 29 Sep 2018 03:25:31 -0700 (PDT)
References: <CAOW+2dtkNjzS0DkD37SD=POtC2Nd6Xe=upyjvVoyBnnMw7qwbQ@mail.gmail.com> <CANN+akb1S=eJNhSOT-e6R1yn_u20nuZNwDFEK7S90ksJ3wt95A@mail.gmail.com> <b890dedd-9f32-890f-3719-5c0c8ffa8345@gmail.com> <CANN+akZtT7dtcCLgLW9AQy+ZFuDHXxJFNxikPGBQCf7Duy0sug@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-0qTc-Qig_39fNhQiz=LV69MPDVC=jskeBVXoz=ANa2vw@mail.gmail.com> <95fbba91-b573-fbe4-3e3d-e9e2c4245fbd@gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-2iGSzE5hXYq-4a=ugaUUzSqR2fk0=iqtLXksgU3DkQEA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lennart Grahl <lennart.grahl@gmail.com>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Autocrypt: addr=lennart.grahl@gmail.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsBNBFMHjy4BCADZR/nHk6jzDsEA2+dPG13NiXyBl34TtChDsZekZyO5jBgwslLgHVksQxlS 79n1lvVH0MxcI8SFifwLAAIjMfukNLGPAjEyJEQhQVpfXxkJXyZgncM2Wq+nlVCDZTiZLg/E 6jJP1zx9vB7sf5dWaB/Dt0YDHLM86EcDChQur9lrJk9K0Jiwt27Oo3B4FFfIOaVNUXgnRPbr Vw1/+O2jLg87Fsib9LP7Ghyv0Z2/VV7wJ4NLsLmIu60vcZVDYDOvcQRH4FZ76VBvlmlO+2TL 5L6yZLGgXS9GZyF3QXKAwhYqu5ouWEOUgXHch5deryjbENanimj4ntZQmF1nkxSZayk9ABEB AAHNJ0xlbm5hcnQgR3JhaGwgPGxlbm5hcnQuZ3JhaGxAZ21haWwuY29tPsLAfwQTAQIAKQUC UwePLgIbIwUJCWYBgAcLCQgHAwIBBhUIAgkKCwQWAgMBAh4BAheAAAoJEPmPvtEEgqumkk0H /2dMGPa9VmgR0kmr2inGODWuCy4WXNUxeEMfY/Hob/8Ou50os6iK35TQI9WtvvlAq23aIvoJ +1OjnqekgKmavPoQ0Uf1h2LegiQNKpDGC6/S33SLitQoQyELyJCU5Ato9lIL0AzpLvr+8UaF plWbPB4Z0GfZGBQSyp0Dmdeb00sld378m9qXHByJfHjPGiDFY+el1talbCuxS87+SvwIvM05 5m1/ceJbZDjx3trvgzbSQOHMT82/Hva7cSyVAch7mJc/lIq2Q0hjoZlD9nqS6gVJ9PQnEW8z dAXXVvBoy9DtomH18jimq+xUxeBwiFRB64gZx3Yyo1CKgULzeWaQ/qfOwE0EUwePLgEIAKP+ Dw5Ow5QuITKcI+ooXZAOBCBOitdsAGrGAEORjv1VyYU1jvjNb07UlRWmpjtaZsQoC2DwfEJy OaBphhErkOVEHCvetfBq8aJ718on4A49XwyQZeyh521BvLQUj0VY5D1iTYzgNVr4Ic39duH/ 00b489Wf9sM7TwzONJOCR5pSKUzYfGUIfQIJRc4tbzOM+bzSknLwbYAWRraOstbRjf2+V3pf 46mzv8tteLnsMm91qshFUwiBfeMNZiKAM3eid80ghlEbQo5J07FOrqK1GxqMi8LQT/oA5lpu +BB6UzGP5nQ5fip95zAq3vu+Iasz1DWj6F1HkHDEHfdtVpTAN70AEQEAAcLAZQQYAQIADwUC UwePLgIbDAUJCWYBgAAKCRD5j77RBIKrpihiCACQq7ARCPSzDrtUcq3uTdP+fMHp8YCYD4UD fdt3vcw4a5JESaknUcWi7CbQrdcLT7iIFYa3pk5I8w4n2lH29uUTWwt9boDtdYkBY5a4Rg+m Z9ndsLh0fHdZM6BXv/6gWMMdGbV5+xcV0FDcXZIlHLZIriDgeZQR3cDEa9lFWUYrI9KKmdoq ngaND7jPZaMCyvn9VDOAGBWxg49gQV/x1d+DiIyMbF9J+ya4YqaSZtu2y/H03eVCawmI6SMH UzdOo+Yqen3Udcdur0KnWMUOP3FIdjgxaPoIEKfFTBy7n8rlzrrTzyrv5Gouusxj0JHMwvuh ixK1bmVy/XYqoG0TVwBt
To: RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <e8ba5762-7c48-4110-e9a2-e172e7198ee2@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 12:25:30 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOJ7v-2iGSzE5hXYq-4a=ugaUUzSqR2fk0=iqtLXksgU3DkQEA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/LFD1FWZZ-ln5dpsTujGFjRIEMkY>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-mdns-ice-candidates
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2018 10:25:36 -0000

I would suggest observing the connection success rate of

* host-to-host candidate pairs only,
* without getUserMedia (on the local side), and
* only if the remote peer also takes part in the mDNS test (should be
easy to recognise by looking at the remote's host candidates but doesn't
work if the remote peer uses getUserMedia... perhaps signal it via an
SDP attribute)

in comparison to as it is now. All of the above conditions should be
required for reporting results because this is the case that we want to
observe.

Cheers
Lennart


On 29.09.2018 08:16, Justin Uberti wrote:
> We will turn it on for N% of Chrome instances and observe the connection
> success rate and setup time versus control.
> 
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 4:05 AM Lennart Grahl <lennart.grahl@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> How will that data be gathered? Is anyone else gathering data? Safari?
>>
>> Cheers
>> Lennart
>>
>> On 28.09.18 01:10, Justin Uberti wrote:
>>> I suggest that we hold off on assessing what this might mean for data
>>> channel and related applications until we have data from browsers showing
>>> the actual connectivity/traffic impact of mDNS.
>>>
>>> We should have initial data on this topic from Chrome by EOY.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 10:14 PM youenn fablet <youennf@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps its feasible for those use cases where the administrator is
>>>>> already aware of the software but definitely not for small applications
>>>>> such as sharedrop.io, Threema Web whose main use case is the direct
>>>>> connection in same network environments and its significant benefits
>>>>> regarding throughput.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I agree this is the most likely scenario where host candidates are
>>>> actually useful: two web browsers doing pure data channel on a
>>>> managed/complex network, and no coordination between the network admin
>>>> being and the app.
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> rtcweb mailing list
>>>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>>
>