IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Working Group Last Call: JSEP

Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com> Wed, 16 November 2016 02:47 UTC

Return-Path: <pthatcher@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48D1612963A for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 18:47:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O3bpd0pVZihI for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 18:47:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x236.google.com (mail-qk0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ED8D129630 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 18:47:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x236.google.com with SMTP id q130so159578978qke.1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 18:47:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=4asrJQssk16jyiDIdJSLy34/EKrFMXit1TCGmgw+5M4=; b=WybxW++8awV+uRz4aZFmUX6/GWJJIzWmUmgejuDjMHmLPeegDHOJM1HRXj3fowkDAl tHahpoRWNVXiUvFvQMVnmjdLvO09pa9fK/dJe8+sLQlQR6FEE050oGtejrip+2WswmGs T8iYGm6cz76JUNA/AfDHENdAO0GaHSkM8B+N9KGMXLAGfAe29WeabTo9ZuKi4siX/J4y s/stDFyL8Ez7AmIpWkKU9KQxU6zsz3HcFkcMitF5yOjJtGgPkLKgnB+LAGubB0LZ+6NE LugqFLfymRRWHc1n5Q+rpEc3AmNZZEikevcL11xN4mzJ1UMheQM+S7eZoDg4bmjl5v/d IY/w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4asrJQssk16jyiDIdJSLy34/EKrFMXit1TCGmgw+5M4=; b=I6lCus0+lKqCRV+9v6vTJ9BjK9ciZwIYHHZRuGh2mOivk/nO//J9Az+Ue445TO/agv fqgCZgBSUKGfLl5A8FSQb8zbIS/axXRJwAoujRc7IDrjXtI5upQhfDH00HtrnTrTxeC9 SSImI0uo6YoqtHsGX3oTsYtySz7GDlGoh0Eb3p+X0gLX3nILseV4Zi5BD1ykQVkZ+Ea8 4rzsMUNQDqjh1D24iRok4nbXn/CGl5nU6fIuxwBYjLcq4s+D16C+gaVmn7rmTF2GGXGa IODlcnJHRA3I+/awngfca2FvdEdGWJJQDLpQUhicb2sriOVUnUZVoCRZ/r6f7H1XHuHS O1gA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02zMLqJjulFrgiWlLBKqOATwPW8HY7DjaQ+ywREnGl9fg3GM7hhWwSEGcszqMQeJEBnyK8aXk6H3HzYtXrC
X-Received: by 10.55.106.134 with SMTP id f128mr908353qkc.121.1479264449397; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 18:47:29 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+9kkMBLcUFs-sdpSnTEHfGVwwG1iDsWpsk1ONHrq2M7LV4g3w@mail.gmail.com> <c4c9d8ff-389a-6eae-0938-ba99b151b9f9@goodadvice.pages.de> <CAOW+2dux2xg6vD0j0ewPKy5dBBR8C=8+7NqfFxqnaF1T6xuJ5Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOW+2dux2xg6vD0j0ewPKy5dBBR8C=8+7NqfFxqnaF1T6xuJ5Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Peter Thatcher <pthatcher@google.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 02:47:18 +0000
Message-ID: <CAJrXDUETsDZejnJyPurS78NfQfbD2NfKQ_7L5jJSPvaBR6SeOQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>, Philipp Hancke <fippo@goodadvice.pages.de>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114fddf6094a9a0541621827"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/L_Ym2tUpJEd4R89BzqWTDj-VwPI>
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, Shijun Sun <sunsj007@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Working Group Last Call: JSEP
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 02:47:32 -0000

I'm late to the party, but a hardy +1 for removing pranswer from me.

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:36 AM Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1.
>
> One of the reasons we added setDirection() was to be able to handle the
> "warm up" case with no recourse to pranswer (as demonstrated in Example 12
> in Section 11.2 as you cite).
>
> Given that, it is hard to motivate an implementation to support pranswer
> (e.g. in the Edge WebRTC 1.0 feature now in Windows Insider Preview, we
> left out support for pranswer).
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Philipp Hancke <fippo@goodadvice.pages.de
> > wrote:
>
> Am 21.10.2016 um 21:25 schrieb Ted Hardie:
>
> The chairs would like to start a working group last call on
> draft-ietf-rtcweb-jset-17 to end on November 9th, 2016, 17:00 KST.
>
> Please review thoroughly, as working through the last comments will be the
> major effort of our working group meeting in Seoul.
>
>
> One question: why is pranswer still in there? The major use-case for this
> seems to be transport warm-up (4.1.7.1) for which I think transceivers are
> the new way as shown in
> http://w3c.github.io/webrtc-pc/#simple-peer-to-peer-example-with-warm-up
>
> pranswer has not seen much traffic on this list. Together with BUNDLE it
> seems to have been broken in Chrome since 2014 if I understand
> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/webrtc/issues/detail?id=3349 correctly. And I
> recall it being broken in 2013 when using DTLS.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email