IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Working Group Last Call: JSEP

Philipp Hancke <fippo@goodadvice.pages.de> Tue, 08 November 2016 18:43 UTC

Return-Path: <fippo@goodadvice.pages.de>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4561F129881 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Nov 2016 10:43:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hgT8d7v3CAVX for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Nov 2016 10:43:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lo.psyced.org (lost.in.psyced.org [188.40.42.221]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B839812959C for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Nov 2016 10:43:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.20.10.5] (2.150.52.103.tmi.telenormobil.no [2.150.52.103]) (authenticated bits=0) by lo.psyced.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id uA8Ihv6g008609 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Nov 2016 19:43:59 +0100
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <CA+9kkMBLcUFs-sdpSnTEHfGVwwG1iDsWpsk1ONHrq2M7LV4g3w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Philipp Hancke <fippo@goodadvice.pages.de>
Message-ID: <c4c9d8ff-389a-6eae-0938-ba99b151b9f9@goodadvice.pages.de>
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2016 19:43:40 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMBLcUFs-sdpSnTEHfGVwwG1iDsWpsk1ONHrq2M7LV4g3w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/Tc3E0JH0JGYnXIGA70FpTa0UfTc>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Working Group Last Call: JSEP
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2016 18:43:57 -0000

Am 21.10.2016 um 21:25 schrieb Ted Hardie:
> The chairs would like to start a working group last call on
> draft-ietf-rtcweb-jset-17 to end on November 9th, 2016, 17:00 KST.
>
> Please review thoroughly, as working through the last comments will be the
> major effort of our working group meeting in Seoul.

One question: why is pranswer still in there? The major use-case for 
this seems to be transport warm-up (4.1.7.1) for which I think 
transceivers are the new way as shown in 
http://w3c.github.io/webrtc-pc/#simple-peer-to-peer-example-with-warm-up

pranswer has not seen much traffic on this list. Together with BUNDLE it 
seems to have been broken in Chrome since 2014 if I understand 
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/webrtc/issues/detail?id=3349 correctly. And 
I recall it being broken in 2013 when using DTLS.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email