Re: [rtcweb] Proposed new milestones for RTCWEB
Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com> Fri, 27 July 2012 13:20 UTC
Return-Path: <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F6C321F85DB for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 06:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.416
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.416 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.167, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZEwGg5isj1eF for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 06:20:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw1.ericsson.se (mailgw1.ericsson.se [193.180.251.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E62421F841D for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 06:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-b7f6c6d000001cc5-a3-5012957f1df3
Received: from esessmw0184.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw1.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 32.DB.07365.F7592105; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 15:19:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.lmf.ericsson.se (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0184.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.82) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.264.0; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 15:19:59 +0200
Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se [131.160.33.3]) by mail.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2401D2478 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 16:19:59 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id A382B533E4 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 16:19:59 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from Salvatore-Loretos-MacBook-Pro.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BD8F533D8 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jul 2012 16:19:59 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <5012957E.2060405@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 16:19:58 +0300
From: Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <CA+9kkMCqAL+Mi1FV-rkNa5Hd67pg7+_8Ztns8j7O6cxtECo8Gw@mail.gmail.com> <5007F6AB.5000705@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <5007F6AB.5000705@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrFLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvrW79VKEAg10XNS3W/mtnd2D0WLLk J1MAYxSXTUpqTmZZapG+XQJXxp5VM1kLZkpUrJw+kamBcb1QFyMnh4SAicT7huNsELaYxIV7 64FsLg4hgVOMEjvnz2eCcDYwSnzrvMkK4VxklHi35gIrSIuQwBFGiZUznSDss4wSR94pgNi8 AtoSP7/vZO5i5OBgEVCV2HlLHCTMJmAm8fzhFrCwqECyxN//6RDVghInZz5hAbFFBIQltr7q ZQKxhQUsJBpff2WCmF4gMe/GGbAaTgEdiUnzL4LZzAK2EhfmXIey5SW2v53DDPGMmsTVc5uY IXq1JHrPdjJNYBSZhWTdLCTts5C0L2BkXsUonJuYmZNebqiXWpSZXFycn6dXnLqJERjeB7f8 1t3BeOqcyCFGaQ4WJXFerqT9/kIC6YklqdmpqQWpRfFFpTmpxYcYmTg4pRoYJ9/4U1YkZKCo Ju1buW9xy0Gj1TwbvV6dXqquWFr5surYHYObJ/VDN3KHNc9mag96w/RT71zMt8rb+9cv7LV8 O+ub0f7AhS/WpJ41DTWS/1GQduiH9ftN2nr22jGvmJUENH4Kmq87ZqZU02K1Zq8Ji1vy2/6q L55bfH9OT06JqI7Qem3Ecj5TiaU4I9FQi7moOBEAqg954T0CAAA=
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Proposed new milestones for RTCWEB
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 13:20:02 -0000
I agree with Stefan, I would suggest March 2013 or even earlier as timeline for the Data On 7/19/12 2:59 PM, Stefan Hakansson LK wrote: > This looks reasonable to me. The possible exception would be: I think > the data parts could be earlier (given that the media stuff can be > delivered as proposed - 4 months extra for the data seems a bit much). > > Stefan > > On 07/18/2012 09:08 PM, Ted Hardie wrote: >> As folks know, we are behind on our milestones. The following >> milestones represent a proposal from me and Magnus, based on some text >> from Cullen. Please review in light of our deliverable list: >> >> 1. Define the communication model in detail, including how session >> management is to occur within the model. >> >> 2. Define a security model that describes the security and privacy >> goals and specifies the security protocol mechanisms necessary >> to achieve those goals. >> >> 3. Define the solution - protocols and API requirements - for >> firewall and NAT traversal. >> >> 4. Define which media functions and extensions shall be supported in >> the client and their usage for real-time media, including media >> adaptation to ensure congestion safe usage. >> >> 5. Define what functionalities in the solution, such as media codecs, >> security algorithms, etc., can be extended and how the >> extensibility mechanisms works. >> >> 6. Define a set of media formats that must or should be supported by >> a client to improve interoperability. >> >> 7. Define how non media data is transported between clients in a >> secure and congestion safe way. >> >> 8. Provide W3C input for the APIs that comes from the communication >> model and the selected components and protocols that are part of >> the solution. >> >> 9. The group will consider options for interworking with legacy VoIP >> equipment. >> >> Timeline: >> >> Sep 2012 - Send Use Cases document to IESG for publication as Informational >> Sep 2012 - Complete Overview (and hold for dependency resolution) >> Sep 2012 - Send Security and Privacy Problem Statement to IESG for >> publication as Informational >> >> Jan 2013 - Send Signalling Negotiation and NAT Traversal to IESG for >> publication as Proposed Standard >> Jan 2013 - Send Security Solution to IESG for publication as Proposed Standard >> Jan 2013 - Send Media Transport, Media Processing, and Codecs to >> IESG for publication as Proposed Standard >> >> May 2013 - Send Data Stream Transport for non-media data to IESG for >> publication as Proposed Standard >> >> Comments, please! >> >> Ted >> _______________________________________________ >> rtcweb mailing list >> rtcweb@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb >> > _______________________________________________ > rtcweb mailing list > rtcweb@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
- [rtcweb] Proposed new milestones for RTCWEB Ted Hardie
- Re: [rtcweb] Proposed new milestones for RTCWEB Stefan Hakansson LK
- Re: [rtcweb] Proposed new milestones for RTCWEB Salvatore Loreto