Re: [rtcweb] Call for review

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 05 March 2019 21:15 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0977130E5B for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 13:15:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T5ZMoMiddkCE for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 13:15:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2d.google.com (mail-io1-xd2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57D421288BD for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 13:15:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2d.google.com with SMTP id e186so8323693ioa.0 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Mar 2019 13:15:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=gh+ZEXk/6yXDvb9e019Uo0J6R/NeXPHK3+7WeN5KjHM=; b=TzsTny3x9ko5U8yZ8vmUyKIIJjZxcPpz2GRIrAAkSXXtWMXgmJTLJ2ZzWKzuiVx9tN Anrygv2Xo7hL+qbrLIAplVGYIw9KCW7mJaWhmipC1rc8zO0xBNPCHGlEzSDdQ6Yop6oE 3boJ0jX01AXkArmRuHs1doD1YECfhhpIemRpPIva56FLp19Lms5NJ7wHBppFh3IoZvhU cjtbHFXtq47ECh8IsiOFP6ofOlPKAbdLMjSg4xKC+y2M7dM/pew1d2bUzV7lF2X9ETqu wPpcZeUE94rzr5hcBL8mkiy5x9NQh0aBPPyBf4+owBWkJM2WjwR+nXhqlYz2bIU987Xv XnYQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gh+ZEXk/6yXDvb9e019Uo0J6R/NeXPHK3+7WeN5KjHM=; b=ZL9jIWErN2qJLsq6kisbJC1yN/b2VEL5PxpAycd2tstDis3nyXL67WPj8kB/ucNdRR sz+uQDRCZjQO8rrzqeEiyBZqO7sxDo9lTr6xJGpVDkUrE23qn61hxV+0hitS4jaoNqJW cISf4FRdABJwK0bMwz+dxa6k/sYXAOwMUgJfnLdYJzIIHEKmsk//6cOaQXtrqg7/+vPH DLx1IzonLLZThYEK+VS4sL9X+WbCD2o7urMDLwgc+hqNSRWRA0VDQTqO9mw4WDekhWAl dP8upJKAbc0OBhJbnmfsRQDkj1dXMUPMPI9tAq7tZdo4g0lrC/+gF3IuqLOvQwG/f5zU xk8w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVjKg3aWf4yIJ11UjqpbxnJqAKDBD6CBLqLZ+Nie764zj4O7vZv DAfAgdlCbEhS4XuDtRzvag7m62ZGfX3K/6epM0M=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqygwYLD5l4PR3eGmsvCpyjK/ifL5rxgJ37DCX6C7F0O/ARjrjsW7Dj+NCXlzjBSRr5r4C1ikryrx67sFfS60jc=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:c543:: with SMTP id v64mr1338947iof.6.1551820535368; Tue, 05 Mar 2019 13:15:35 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+9kkMBEzEFtRyvApTs9p4AvixMFO0Fe-Z+Wk5mh09ZxY_4uOQ@mail.gmail.com> <811b3bb7-8458-4790-b5af-7c4faedc133a@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <811b3bb7-8458-4790-b5af-7c4faedc133a@www.fastmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 13:15:09 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMBMV3kGmrEKSiTSN7DaR3e3XHe7GE4N8x=HgFzxk+Eq-g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
Cc: RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c4123b05835f5fc5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/NhPK6ZkK2-Mna7JJXLj3Jc4z5qM>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Call for review
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 21:15:39 -0000

On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 1:10 PM Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> wrote:

> How is it that the two drafts this rules on are only informative
> references? It probably needs to update IP handling.
>
> The modes this adds are good, but it specifically states that the
> implications aren't known. It even promises to update the draft when that
> information is gained.  That suggests that this doc might have an uncertain
> future. What is the chairs' thinking about the draft?
>
>
Traditionally, Experimental is the best fit for docs with that
characteristic.

Ted

> On Wed, Mar 6, 2019, at 07:22, Ted Hardie wrote:
> > Howdy,
> >
> > draft-uberti-ip-handling-ex-
> > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-uberti-ip-handling-ex-mdns/>mdns
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-uberti-ip-handling-ex-mdns/> is a
> very short draft describing two new modes related to
> draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling <
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling> using bits of
> draft-ietf-rtcweb-mdns-ice-candidates <
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-mdns-ice-candidates/>.
> >
> > The chairs would like to ask for a couple of reviews; given that it is
> > four pages long, we are hopeful that it will not take much time.
> >
> > Please send your review to the list,
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > Ted
> > _______________________________________________
> > rtcweb mailing list
> > rtcweb@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>