IETF Logo Mail Archive

[rtcweb] Query regarding rtcweb use cases and requirements.

<ajrmeyn@gmail.com> Tue, 27 March 2012 07:52 UTC

Return-Path: <ajrmeyn@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F5921F87CB for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:52:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_83=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jVesW7VdauIZ for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com (mail-lb0-f172.google.com [209.85.217.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED48621F8766 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:52:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lbol12 with SMTP id l12so5037949lbo.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:52:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type :x-priority:x-msmail-priority:importance:x-mailer:x-mimeole; bh=75f0M+6cEcUNRR4Mk7xk9pDPM075+Fm90Ty9A5+r+p8=; b=gYID8x/el0469hGk6V3cOToe+FuThpyykjaOWBYUBakK63RMXA/HSKVjbTESimC/xr KVxgCRRgVMJUaxn7jXpuEIpbCVITDxXkwtfDk4digdjVqt9HSeVnfcdzPQNAhxSgi+o6 FBilWf3xnt2I39E5fiumA/Zwwi48w5jyQ1eKAMWRA35dFuWViRgPwFe+xyWSBa35TFfd 40cTXZCJC5rifAa9iJ+mdPWJw2+9mQ3pw86z9/u+VB8t0rwVrhVoLnHO4xUWTbEyfkU5 9k6385zBaf/+xKFY1uEh/s242RTJhBcKpOtJuY9hG2XePCUEhHk2isekD/zslEbiUUm/ hwLg==
Received: by 10.112.105.101 with SMTP id gl5mr8575162lbb.71.1332834720629; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:52:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from devbox ([2001:708:30:1090:b05a:6cc3:d370:3016]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ox7sm25010712lbb.17.2012.03.27.00.51.59 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:51:59 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <FA86515700364A16B4EDF69E88E3FA1A@devbox>
From: ajrmeyn@gmail.com
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:51:58 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0045_01CD0C07.A1E646E0"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3538.513
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3538.513
Subject: [rtcweb] Query regarding rtcweb use cases and requirements.
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 07:52:04 -0000

Hi, This is with regards to the following document:Web Real-Time Communication Use-cases and Requirements
draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements-06.txt
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements/?include_text=1 
I have noticed that the use cases with regards to Data API of web real time communication, have not been addressed. For example: use cases that are related to file sharing between browsers. 

is there any particular reason for the same?

Regards,
Antony Meyn

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email