IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-09.txt

"DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com> Fri, 05 December 2014 11:10 UTC

Return-Path: <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E79C1ACE3A for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 03:10:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ITEdaVCqrQ9n for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 03:09:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABEDD1ACE4D for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 03:09:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.42]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 21E648C54E7C7; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 11:09:50 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.112]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id sB5B9Top024620 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 5 Dec 2014 12:09:52 +0100
Received: from FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.7.25]) by FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.112]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 12:09:38 +0100
From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal <muthu.arul@gmail.com>, "Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <rmohanr@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-09.txt
Thread-Index: AQHQEHsDO3YNfP0zyUqKnd9OD6B+a5yA1eWA
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 11:09:37 +0000
Message-ID: <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B28D5F4@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <20141204174709.26945.65249.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <D0A731B1.1AE1E%rmohanr@cisco.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D57C013@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <D0A78A99.1B183%rmohanr@cisco.com> <CAKz0y8w720LqX2xRm5AHErXqsppVXhvQym5hZ+hoRyzcPaYxnw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKz0y8w720LqX2xRm5AHErXqsppVXhvQym5hZ+hoRyzcPaYxnw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.40]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/TMWbuD2o33hJSpXb6yTyN5fTIfE
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-09.txt
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 11:10:04 -0000

No - it is issued

All you can provide is the -10

I believe the chairs may be able to place some annotations abot the -09 on the datatracker entry 

Keith

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of 
> Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal
> Sent: 05 December 2014 11:02
> To: Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
> Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action: 
> draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-09.txt
> 
> Does anyone know if there is a way to get -09 version removed 
> from the datatracker?
> 
> Muthu
> 
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Ram Mohan R (rmohanr) 
> <rmohanr@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 	Sorry this is a issue w.r.t picking up a wrong version. 
> We had removed
> 	liveness in ver 8. I will check and publish the correct 
> revision.
> 	
> 	Ram
> 	
> 
> 	-----Original Message-----
> 	From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
> 	Date: Friday, 5 December 2014 1:52 pm
> 	To: Cisco Employee <rmohanr@cisco.com>, 
> "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
> 	Subject: RE: [rtcweb] I-D Action:
> 	draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-09.txt
> 	
> 	>Hi,
> 	>
> 	>I thought the idea was to remove the 
> liveness/heartbeat feature, but it
> 	>is still in the draft.
> 	>
> 	>Regards,
> 	>
> 	>Christer
> 	>
> 	>-----Original Message-----
> 	>From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Ram Mohan R
> 	>(rmohanr)
> 	>Sent: 5. joulukuuta 2014 6:19
> 	>To: rtcweb@ietf.org
> 	>Subject: Re: [rtcweb] I-D Action:
> 	>draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-09.txt
> 	>
> 	>This version addresses all the WGLC comments received.
> 	>Please review and let us know if any thing else is missing.
> 	>
> 	>Regards,
> 	>Authors
> 	>
> 	>-----Original Message-----
> 	>From: "internet-drafts@ietf.org" <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
> 	>Date: Thursday, 4 December 2014 11:17 pm
> 	>To: "i-d-announce@ietf.org" <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
> 	>Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
> 	>Subject: [rtcweb] I-D Action:
> 	>draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-09.txt
> 	>
> 	>>
> 	>>A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line 
> Internet-Drafts
> 	>>directories.
> 	>> This draft is a work item of the Real-Time Communication in
> 	>>WEB-browsers Working Group of the IETF.
> 	>>
> 	>>        Title           : STUN Usage for Consent Freshness
> 	>>        Authors         : Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal
> 	>>                          Dan Wing
> 	>>                          Ram Mohan Ravindranath
> 	>>                          Tirumaleswar Reddy
> 	>>                          Martin Thomson
> 	>>      Filename        : 
> draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-freshness-09.txt
> 	>>      Pages           : 9
> 	>>      Date            : 2014-12-04
> 	>>
> 	>>Abstract:
> 	>>   To prevent sending excessive traffic to an 
> endpoint, periodic consent
> 	>>   needs to be obtained from that remote endpoint.
> 	>>
> 	>>   This document describes a consent mechanism using 
> a new Session
> 	>>   Traversal Utilities for NAT (STUN) usage.  This 
> same mechanism can
> 	>>   also determine connection loss ("liveness") with a 
> remote peer.
> 	>>
> 	>>
> 	>>The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> 	
> >>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-cons
> ent-freshne
> 	>>ss/
> 	>>
> 	>>There's also a htmlized version available at:
> 	
> >>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-consent-fr
> eshness-09
> 	>>
> 	>>A diff from the previous version is available at:
> 	
> >>http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rtcweb-stun-cons
> ent-freshne
> 	>>ss-
> 	>>09
> 	>>
> 	>>
> 	>>Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from 
> the time of
> 	>>submission until the htmlized version and diff are 
> available at
> 	>>tools.ietf.org.
> 	>>
> 	>>Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> 	>>ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 	>>
> 	>>_______________________________________________
> 	>>rtcweb mailing list
> 	>>rtcweb@ietf.org
> 	>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> 	>
> 	>_______________________________________________
> 	>rtcweb mailing list
> 	>rtcweb@ietf.org
> 	>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> 	
> 	_______________________________________________
> 	rtcweb mailing list
> 	rtcweb@ietf.org
> 	https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> 	
> 
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email