Re: [rtcweb] Mandatory to implement video codec?
"DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com> Wed, 27 November 2013 10:25 UTC
Return-Path: <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CBE71AE029 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 02:25:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BXbk8_z06RYL for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 02:25:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ihemail2.lucent.com (ihemail2.lucent.com [135.245.0.35]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 064791AD68D for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 02:25:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-239-2-42.lucent.com [135.239.2.42]) by ihemail2.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id rARAPXrU021368 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 04:25:35 -0600 (CST)
Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.111]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id rARAPWKa019785 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:25:33 +0100
Received: from FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.7.203]) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.111]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:25:33 +0100
From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Mandatory to implement video codec?
Thread-Index: Ac7cLiqalLlZVs40QU+PGyClgL6FtQPLLwbA
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 10:25:32 +0000
Message-ID: <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B0EE419@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.41]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.35
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Mandatory to implement video codec?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 10:25:39 -0000
A reminder that I have not had any response to this mail. It would be nice if someone cound direct me to the right place. Keith > -----Original Message----- > From: DRAGE, Keith (Keith) > Sent: 08 November 2013 02:57 > To: rtcweb@ietf.org > Subject: Mandatory to implement video codec? > > References have been made to a prior consensus decision to > have a mandatory to implement video codec. > > I'd like to refresh myself on those discussions and am having > difficulty finding them. > > Can someone remember when they occurred and therefore point > me in the right direction? > > Regards > > Keith
- [rtcweb] Mandatory to implement video codec? DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] Mandatory to implement video codec? tim panton
- Re: [rtcweb] Mandatory to implement video codec? DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [rtcweb] Mandatory to implement video codec? Magnus Westerlund