IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Results of call for consensus on ICE transport parameter issue

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Tue, 19 February 2019 21:19 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F05112D4EF for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 13:19:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.889
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.889 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=telurix-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OUalNqTTYTsA for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 13:19:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x536.google.com (mail-pg1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::536]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05A2B12D4ED for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 13:19:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x536.google.com with SMTP id m1so10703086pgq.8 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 13:19:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telurix-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9biXuBX33DjY4N/Z1I0LtkZCgA+K5M3xNJvFB3mNBPU=; b=bPewHBxay2MJTktUy9K+7Ulydt2I6E8mCSJZ4vG4dvcdv2Dqo1w5a0zu97pjJ5gXdx DIeeK4sHG0FxAKR/ZWBZCq/IYoN/G1jn3SpcOywXf7IzuwuPURzT+DnhTy4g0Ld/BiIj PIfHhxPoVeqU3YGZq2PCB1T6YshuO/t4lup4kBNCIWNYzD6l+OLWTEfiKIwkMoRwwsgW zMzdPVCI9lARRtY9ARp4GojpYd37tmO+LHuSKyoWAMFQocYaJxkhegxtIe17iPWVzCJw tq5SpZO5Lh3HB28F3O5G5aV286fyf+RvDbfkIkdg+Cwr2G2vcpB2SGORFm5w9N382Xus BszQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9biXuBX33DjY4N/Z1I0LtkZCgA+K5M3xNJvFB3mNBPU=; b=N/memwznGNPVbDBrYyzCSYjyFJtm/yyDic8jE/m6xKoobsV6VP64BVY/wrysIxREIm cJoUXJ3T9ddeuRdXL2ijpq9IkkCvaRQqR5+a7Uuv2TETXArSCMNXR4ZG41ggOP+rg/eJ SC5sBpfMsZcwKfNFK3ga88xcluAoX+ELDbD4UVESN27NUpI/9alUSfi5fQ1+j6tPlae/ ko27ehe9dhn27JB4o4+rRSC0g8DwaLANrAQQmuc6tQpxP7alhBewGknh4pPeE2kcTv+V V/1k2OBvOZ2PeWcwoR4bLoTX/HHtILWBpeyNpYXKpMJR8M07odwLgWfygPxuy71Jkfr1 Obvg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAubDfhqxcU0PP38p9JxnRNrbsNgMkh5cNxKxjStTw00PsN2PrIUW Z5eIzR0QgspLch/wMRIRPCmLq9PMw9U=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IZU70tep3OJxBOq6SOBLwfo6q8DrhV5sRhHMYqaXXQA2HGxkfsm498/ca+CDmmXzSSYYE+zsQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:6e02:: with SMTP id j2mr21361969pgc.229.1550611147342; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 13:19:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-f171.google.com (mail-pg1-f171.google.com. [209.85.215.171]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o16sm18979951pgv.41.2019.02.19.13.19.06 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 19 Feb 2019 13:19:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-f171.google.com with SMTP id i130so10730605pgd.1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 13:19:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a63:1a62:: with SMTP id a34mr2089748pgm.60.1550611146093; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 13:19:06 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+9kkMDMMfEU2QE9AkPXsCgHp1gB=X6_-jAKvH6FsWhqNkV_Kg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-2QLpD5Y5xdB1jKPS3uqsh7TMFFMR57YB1KTPTCcJ1F7w@mail.gmail.com> <0F9730B2-3E44-439D-9832-4C4AEBC054B5@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <0F9730B2-3E44-439D-9832-4C4AEBC054B5@ericsson.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 16:18:55 -0500
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAD5OKxvHWr2wPhzdT_v8mAgOVBC0E1DHfGMqBNCtyGBD-+0U-g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxvHWr2wPhzdT_v8mAgOVBC0E1DHfGMqBNCtyGBD-+0U-g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Justin Uberti <juberti=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008c3a62058245ca7d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/Y9ggbX7uDL25z10gSs9B8Jw_lOU>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Results of call for consensus on ICE transport parameter issue
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 21:19:11 -0000

Hi Justin,

I did provide editorial feedback to the change on github:

1. This document refers to SDP protocol as profile. If you look at the
referenced documents that define "profiles" in JSEP, they all refer to them
as protocols. Also, in case of SRTP, profile is actually something
different and refers to SRTP key parameters.

2. Default candidate does not have profile (or protocol), it has transport,
port, and (connection-)address. So each "m=" and "c=" MUST be filled in
with port, protocol, and address to match port, transport, and address of
the default candidate for the m= section, as described in ice-sip-sdp.

Regards,
_____________
Roman Shpount


On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 3:05 PM Christer Holmberg <
christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:

> Looks good.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Christer
>
>
>
> *From: *rtcweb <rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Justin Uberti
> <juberti=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> *Date: *Saturday, 16 February 2019 at 3.57
> *To: *Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
> *Cc: *"rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [rtcweb] Results of call for consensus on ICE transport
> parameter issue
>
>
>
> I have updated this PR to incorporate minor feedback that was received
> during the consensus call. Those who had feedback, please take another look
> and comment on the PR if you are satisfied.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 2:56 PM Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The chairs believe that there was rough consensus among those responding
> to make the change in:
>
>
>
> https://github.com/rtcweb-wg/jsep/pull/863
>
>
>
> Given the state of the document, it will be the Area Director's call as to
> how much of the post-working group approval process must be re-done.
> Authors, please wait on his direction before publishing a new version with
> this merged.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Ted and Sean
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email