[rtcweb] Fwd: [rmcat] time to get busy
Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 03 October 2013 15:45 UTC
Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 259E721E80A9 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 08:45:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bl08FiFQUXLc for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 08:45:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x229.google.com (mail-ie0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B28521E80BF for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 08:36:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f169.google.com with SMTP id tp5so5876240ieb.14 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 08:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=TaFjmdubpk+zD2tPa+o3XyyWuz4BYCcXjyWxyz4CGBY=; b=VX/X30H7f986Khj8MDG1DG2FYv5vWsQK+KxczAO8N+haxh6+TRjuN7adGDiKoYD7wM abi7XM2Z770qu2ts2UFoSJ8dFIm/Xxzk27/g2Tvz7dFkXuiV+Ukn11K2Y9DuSS31qL2D kP7h4hd72ZXLWXU+MeuNETS+PyXG75sMxGyYI7xKzU08rqkRXGz8fG4uwDhwAr+6i0uA eZcSx2dJHKa7LYxF0EezQByHWNnp/sJhHvvJNSfUDTfsJOz93JDUfQ8iIu1jl5MqHGqV p7UjIOffk1XqQliSF6I3DBzQgVK6g70+gt6UM1QKNe4mE9TDWWjXj/yEc4YnZ7w5bJfP 8mIA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.9.72 with SMTP id x8mr2641377iga.19.1380814557460; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 08:35:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.29.202 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 08:35:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <C9BC5A61-FE7C-44DD-99CD-285B67B0BB51@netapp.com>
References: <C9BC5A61-FE7C-44DD-99CD-285B67B0BB51@netapp.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 08:35:57 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMAZvtdpe8py4cErs4svqzsfUuzzFOUN4YWGKpgB1kgCTw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="001a11c2fdc432dc2004e7d7f121"
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
Subject: [rtcweb] Fwd: [rmcat] time to get busy
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 15:45:26 -0000
Dear WG members, As you see below, the RMCAT working group is seeking reviewers for the requirements document and evaluations scenarios. Please review the document. thanks, Ted, Cullen, Magnus ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Eggert, Lars <lars@netapp.com> Date: Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 4:56 AM Subject: [rmcat] time to get busy To: "rmcat@ietf.org WG" <rmcat@ietf.org> Hi folks, it's only six short weeks to the ID submission cutoff for Vancouver. I'd like us to complete some work before then; specifically: (1) Reviews for draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements-00, so that we can last-call it in Vancouver. Any volunteers? (2) Have some rough consensus on at least one initial evaluation scenario. This includes a network topology, a traffic workload and a list of performance metrics for that scenario. On (2), is the design team still having calls? I have not seen any announcements on the list after Berlin. If not, we should probably restart the calls. Thanks, Lars
- [rtcweb] Fwd: [rmcat] time to get busy Ted Hardie