Re: [rtcweb] Comments on draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-05

[Bjoern Hoehrmann <[e-mail]>]

* Harald Alvestrand wrote:
>On 01/30/2013 01:23 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:

>The point of a Last Call at this point is (at least I think of it that 
>way) that any proposal for a substantive change in the document after a 
>concluded Last Call is treated as reopening a closed issue, rather than 
>continuing an open debate on which no conclusion has been drawn.

Should I take this to mean that before the document is sent to the IESG
for publication there would be another call for comments to look at more
editorial issues? I am fine with your other responses, but...

>> There seem to be many phrases used in the document that are not very
>> suitable for a general audience, examples are "communications event",
>> "communications partnership", and "a strong changer of the marketplace
>> of deployment". (Two of the phrases there come from the last paragraph
>> in 2.3. which as a whole is not very comprehensible and probably needs
>> to be re-written).
>
>At the moment, I do not know of a better way to write it. There probably 
>is one, but I don't have it.

... this probably needs to be looked at again prior to an IETF-wide Last
Call; I do agree that it can wait a while.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:[e-mail] · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: [phone] · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/