Re: [rtcweb] Some videos to download for today presentation

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Thu, 14 March 2013 13:52 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D075A11E80FE for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 06:52:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P0prJsMXtteB for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 06:52:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaman.nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEBE721F8CDD for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 06:52:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-5033.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-5033.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.80.51]) (authenticated bits=0) by shaman.nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r2EDqcMb094093 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 14 Mar 2013 08:52:39 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
Message-ID: <5141D626.8060703@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 09:52:38 -0400
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130216 Thunderbird/17.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
References: <402DA32C-FC49-4D71-9BE1-C955C4564A37@iii.ca>
In-Reply-To: <402DA32C-FC49-4D71-9BE1-C955C4564A37@iii.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Received-SPF: pass (shaman.nostrum.com: 130.129.80.51 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Some videos to download for today presentation
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:52:50 -0000

Since Cullen is posting videos to show off the difference between 
hardware encoding and software encoding, I think there's possibly also 
value in showing the difference between VP8 and H.264 encoding. Here's a 
set of video pairs that demonstrate that difference:

http://www.quavlive.com/video_codec_comparison

/a

On 3/14/13 08:06, Cullen Jennings wrote:
> Download these two videos and see how you think they compare. Don’t watch them on the dropbox site as it does funky things in it’s playback. I'm going to be discussion them in my talk today and will try and show them on the screen but it will be easier to compare them if you just download them and play them on your own computer.
>
> Video A: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/17089001/VidComp/a.mov
>
> Video B: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/17089001/VidComp/b.mov
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb