Re: [rtcweb] Transports: RFC 4941 support?

Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Sun, 23 March 2014 01:46 UTC

Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DB4D1A08C5 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 18:46:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2UnMduLyXu5k for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 18:46:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-f178.google.com (mail-we0-f178.google.com [74.125.82.178]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AE0F1A0762 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 18:46:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id u56so2570719wes.9 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 18:46:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=fa/gngma2xPkACT5+VSMb1EESvuIgXbGtl1hGEdDBvY=; b=AQHlUJ0CVMpCk4hO3Uo/7ULGXncd4Nq0c/gVCnwRr7edJC8eMuXan5SxTqJVb67gJI mIue/7+3vlfgtajd9aBNQiRgNRcs+zYQNXnKRF+csFEQ/OJPsAJZ6KMKZ9w9+qSgEUeV QJquym1IhDxtZAsfHs72ijdPiOZQgMmb6NwS3/ehNjuEsEJxo+wwlrtr1inLqWIpCuHV 9XId5SAahhihXEiltYOzo0R/0qbWaJNHxdIkYfIQ81JLbUNHJbPAL/zMScqYtwW+V4co KMnj9y258Gh+Yv2vz1RodY/M03LiAjy9xXkTt/AAbF1iecUQ3SVAvw6Nj6cmJpg1v3lV WXcA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlqFzMMAEQeqix/4RUHGJFh5uOjHvIG0qUKflwi/1BvSWhMXJ8op3hWxWWArDK0Xu8ShsVd
X-Received: by 10.180.185.197 with SMTP id fe5mr6545237wic.56.1395539196600; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 18:46:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-f175.google.com (mail-we0-f175.google.com [74.125.82.175]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id t5sm21535470wjw.15.2014.03.22.18.46.34 for <rtcweb@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 22 Mar 2014 18:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f175.google.com with SMTP id q58so2512953wes.6 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 18:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.164.107 with SMTP id yp11mr6188873wib.37.1395539194535; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 18:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.49.137 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 18:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <532DFB7D.5080504@alvestrand.no>
References: <CAOJ7v-0Hw0NFs_avsB2Z8do21BCws2LRZSeSh6HP0t455SPXyw@mail.gmail.com> <B6836FFA-867A-4CBF-9855-D265425EC5E1@cisco.com> <CAOqqYVE=i2L7FxGgKuV0DVaaxYOPnxzSEbDoq0_4Tqapna575g@mail.gmail.com> <CD747481-EBDA-4FFC-A31D-618E6E217420@cisco.com> <5329B617.2070001@alvestrand.no> <17885A74-50A3-49E3-8C54-E53C55019C73@cisco.com> <CAOJ7v-0Dx4Owam7NzXqs6ALPi+ps9gKbmFK9=Zu5eBr9yHYgKg@mail.gmail.com> <444DE75E-BF07-4C6F-91B1-CF57DC67FBA3@cisco.com> <CA+9kkMD5jG-w7ahHLsUX9QMSkSMArS4Wz7ZYOucAZWkrmz5YsQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-1JZG547KkiWeG=3zfCFk6WVzm+r9kF0MTg3SQynHMJdg@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxvKJRMYGYDRNKvmdxmsc35B16P4-+73E+o85-re42yrzw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-2hMHJUGhKKocvu5Ld9_cr+duSbJ=+rEucUaAmjiooZTA@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxv5xHknbsPCYpysvo7CeA7oKFu+Yy7QJbmVd6s1UyLr7A@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMBQ=Otxq0vNgKQEoY6UmrEd73625vvBMr45h7MvJFS+Pw@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxtwH-rrkN5BA7zt9kFLC6+sTZAnGjBh+JvFc7FmYMoKVg@mail.gmail.com> <532DF135.1090509@alvestrand.no> <532DFB7D.5080504@alvestrand.no>
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 21:46:34 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxtBtYE=+Ebu6ih0jWpfoSNvZs1xjuDuDCrHt-F6CX2kdA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba309486f5ec9e04f53c4916
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/aP4Zjes4hYVQesWjy0tE55U_H68
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Transports: RFC 4941 support?
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 01:46:41 -0000

I was incorrect. It is normal to get both temp and permanent IPv6 addresses
on Windows and Ubuntu.

_____________
Roman Shpount


On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>wrote;wrote:

>  On 03/22/2014 09:23 PM, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
>
> On 03/21/2014 06:10 PM, Roman Shpount wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>   On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>wrote;wrote:
>>
>>>    The whole problem (with using temp or permanent addresses) is a bit
>>> imaginary since under most common client setups you only see temporary
>>> addresses. Permanent IPv6 addresses show up only on servers or if
>>> specifically configured on the host.
>>>
>>
>> It's actually not imaginary in enterprise contexts, as there are shops
>> that disable temporary addresses to make tracking or other security
>> activities easier.  Not my favorite reasoning, personally, but there you go.
>>
>
>  What I meant is situation where you have both temp and permanent
> addresses on the same interface is quite unusual. In most cases it is one
> or the other. Getting both addresses configured usually requires some very
> deliberate administrative action, and unless I am mistaken, is not common.
>
>
> I think you are mistaken..... at least, your claim does not fit with my
> data.
>
> This laptop, on a default-configured IPv6 home network:
>
>     inet6 2001:470:de0a:27:9964:c162:8161:9a2e/64 scope global temporary
> dynamic
>        valid_lft 86356sec preferred_lft 14356sec
>     inet6 2001:470:de0a:27:863a:4bff:fe0b:28b0/64 scope global dynamic
>        valid_lft 86356sec preferred_lft 14356sec
>
> Some very deliberate administrative action may have been taken (this is a
> Google corporate device), but I suspect that it's a default Ubuntu
> configuration.
>
>
> And just to get people used to looking at stuff for themselves, here's my
> desktop machine, which is DEFINITELY a default Ubuntu setup:
>
> hta@liset:~$ ip addr
> 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
>     link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
>     inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
>     inet6 ::1/128 scope host
>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state
> UP qlen 1000
>     link/ether 6c:3b:e5:0b:6a:b4 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>     inet 192.168.1.17/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope global eth0
>     inet6 2001:470:de0a:27:d014:dc1:dd24:4393/64 scope global temporary
> dynamic
>        valid_lft 86379sec preferred_lft 14379sec
>     inet6 2001:470:de0a:27:31d8:d7fc:4af4:c17a/64 scope global temporary
> deprecated dynamic
>        valid_lft 86379sec preferred_lft 0sec
>     inet6 2001:470:de0a:27:8c26:e950:a09d:814c/64 scope global temporary
> deprecated dynamic
>        valid_lft 86379sec preferred_lft 0sec
>     inet6 2001:470:de0a:27:d883:fc90:cdcd:6b8f/64 scope global temporary
> deprecated dynamic
>        valid_lft 86379sec preferred_lft 0sec
>     inet6 2001:470:de0a:27:40c9:8eca:a92b:d0ac/64 scope global temporary
> deprecated dynamic
>        valid_lft 86379sec preferred_lft 0sec
>     inet6 2001:470:de0a:27:55e8:a88d:df95:df5d/64 scope global temporary
> deprecated dynamic
>        valid_lft 86379sec preferred_lft 0sec
>     inet6 2001:470:de0a:27:accc:2652:cc97:5b17/64 scope global temporary
> deprecated dynamic
>        valid_lft 76189sec preferred_lft 0sec
>     inet6 2001:470:de0a:27:6e3b:e5ff:fe0b:6ab4/64 scope global dynamic
>        valid_lft 86379sec preferred_lft 14379sec
>     inet6 fe80::6e3b:e5ff:fe0b:6ab4/64 scope link
>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>
> Ignoring the deprecated ones, one temporary and one non-temporary.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>