IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Tunnelling DTLS in SDP

Tim Panton <tim@phonefromhere.com> Tue, 05 April 2016 09:58 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@phonefromhere.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04F3712D1A0 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 02:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2uOUOzdONV1D for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 02:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp002.apm-internet.net (smtp002.apm-internet.net [85.119.248.221]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF4CA12D0B9 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 02:58:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 62245 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2016 09:58:25 -0000
X-AV-Scan: clean
X-APM-Authkey: 83769/0 3303
Received: from unknown (HELO zimbra003.verygoodemail.com) (85.119.248.218) by smtp002.apm-internet.net with SMTP; 5 Apr 2016 09:58:25 -0000
Received: from zimbra003.verygoodemail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra003.verygoodemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFE1018A0666; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 10:58:24 +0100 (BST)
Received: from zimbra003.verygoodemail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra003.verygoodemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E281218A046D; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 10:58:24 +0100 (BST)
Received: from limit.westhawk.co.uk (unknown [192.67.4.33]) by zimbra003.verygoodemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C528218A046C; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 10:58:24 +0100 (BST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Tim Panton <tim@phonefromhere.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnX8sFokYpNEYG=qa=cqfJwUwjC8ucgbay5bQoezGAvpxg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 10:58:24 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <82A90D4E-4793-4A21-BB7D-CE3594D55AF6@phonefromhere.com>
References: <CABcZeBOM1KoXpXFhvjS753EVpsMENWVen3CCdFj8ry36vPH0dg@mail.gmail.com> <D5416C24-0032-48CB-8CC6-FD5D4E046C0D@phonefromhere.com> <CABkgnnX8sFokYpNEYG=qa=cqfJwUwjC8ucgbay5bQoezGAvpxg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/cQNCUcS35LWOBMBK43h4_dVGAfU>
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, mmusic WG <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Tunnelling DTLS in SDP
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 09:58:29 -0000

> On 4 Apr 2016, at 18:34, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 4 April 2016 at 12:39, pfh <tim@phonefromhere.com> wrote:
>> It strikes me we could get the same reduced latency benefits by piggybacking
>> on ICE
>> rather than SDP, e.g. embedding the DTLS packet as data in a new STUN
>> attribute type.
> 
> One of the goals for connectivity checks is to keep them small.
> Cramming DTLS in is not compatible with this.

It wouldn’t be in every ICE packet, just in ones with (say) USE-CANDIDATE set.

T.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email