Re: [rtcweb] draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch: Final PRs

Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> Mon, 22 July 2019 13:54 UTC

Return-Path: <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC811200B5 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 06:54:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HHaFXMtE1Ty4 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 06:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72c.google.com (mail-qk1-x72c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50154120059 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 06:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72c.google.com with SMTP id v22so28623539qkj.8 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 06:54:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=pzRg89YnTPe2Te7WQf84X7UYHnNGmCEO6orkmlxX6r4=; b=Gi/4zyGkbk35xOMtymA8WOdQc8BOkdWz50u88z+GWh5cw7bxa2KV/vV/5zM/mPLX+b IEbJtaSQSFbYSqiqbFpmZmPb/hsH1vrX5UD4nn4ktD2HkAQHufCH0Ndq+evYzoGREWkR stta8BOlcEEccZCnkzW1J2y8R/+L7TzfvKWJ8=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=pzRg89YnTPe2Te7WQf84X7UYHnNGmCEO6orkmlxX6r4=; b=QfjrXVUlwNltQ5I9cRhg5t/9sHvKFxcEDgze9qe0GMcSoC6G/FQCVYnZIVRT8BV0FJ /gvXJ0dehmNKOKGQGqkg9/52qmm1/KrCjQZOlyOCp0PNmlNzZ5yJ9U/4EvvAXqdmnJ76 2y5iBjrFtsZKtW19VnCkAi+LTmaJ90yMNFX3jOSpSY1L6qwP+CrTjxbb37mH08ylEwTw fiOPv9zjj3MwGXFCSqYEBDTMdlvaxJRjQ5YUzry5B3x5x/3oimko9X+/24z1OexuEZ7i 6SAsNFWbRG1ifE1rKGT+Fb7TDs4Ajpj33q5MuH2Tu1B5HIBI1fSMgZd2P7SRgmLykXp0 UJ9Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWkfOta8JAe9iGoo/KaYHWcVoIP22gRQmxbaduXI1aGYsh7eIeN moa0e2KrdlAqZAmsRnVg1ZYRyzaPLGc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxwPLz5RHXTK+UiV/lioWbh9IC/u1UQ3uYZpufddjomGdSQOwgvCdXRLzyRicOf13RvIPjyDA==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:6982:: with SMTP id e124mr13066261qkc.291.1563803661292; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 06:54:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:1232:144:b81e:cafc:6735:5203? ([2001:67c:1232:144:b81e:cafc:6735:5203]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j61sm18346523qte.47.2019.07.22.06.54.20 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 22 Jul 2019 06:54:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 09:54:19 -0400
References: <545FC32C-D601-4888-80E9-BF615FE98BD0@sn3rd.com>
To: RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <545FC32C-D601-4888-80E9-BF615FE98BD0@sn3rd.com>
Message-Id: <E9FE8D84-EA22-402C-9F69-B840D73A780B@sn3rd.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/eZsuLwL5aFH-4sU873pCqF80-1A>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch: Final PRs
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 13:54:24 -0000

All,

Jully 22nd is here so I am going to close this out and consider the PRs approved.

ekr,

Please spin a new version to incorporate the PR for the reference change.

Adam.

Once the new version hits the street feel free to hit the button to move this to the next state.

spt


> On Jul 10, 2019, at 19:12, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>; wrote:
> 
> Hi! ekr has spun a new version of draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arc [0].  All of the changes were to address the outstanding IESG DISCUSS positions or were a result of following on discussions with Ben K (Security AD).  While I think all of these are good changes, there were three changes that affected 2119-language and we need to get the WGs take on these.  Two of these changes are in s5.1.4  (SHOULD->MUST and the addition of a new MUST) and one is in s7.6 (addition of a new SHOULD).  These are most easily seen by looking at the diffs [1].  If you object to these changes, then please let the list know by July 22nd.
> 
> Note that these are the last issues remaining before this draft as well as draft-ietf-rtcweb-security and draft-ietf-rtcweb-ip-handling can move into the RFC editor’s queue.  At that point we will be dangerously close to be done.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> spt
> 
> [0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch/
> 
> [1] https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch-18&url2=draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch-19