IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] JSEP-06: max-bundle policy questions

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Mon, 24 February 2014 20:02 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D791A01DA for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 12:02:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.952
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.952 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ytkOJ7JqU0DY for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 12:02:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgw1.ericsson.se (mailgw1.ericsson.se [193.180.251.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17F661A020D for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 12:01:48 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-b7f5d8e000002a7b-85-530ba52bcf81
Received: from ESESSHC007.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw1.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 8F.23.10875.B25AB035; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 21:01:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.216]) by ESESSHC007.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.39]) with mapi id 14.02.0387.000; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 21:01:47 +0100
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] JSEP-06: max-bundle policy questions
Thread-Index: Ac8xgReyx0/WK3m4RUOln8j3WJLYRQACZUGAAALZDkr///DBAP//5uqA
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 20:01:46 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D1B597C@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D1B552E@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CABkgnnV4fQqL6noAr1ss4-7qxSjtbSL_zvBcHxa7w-M_w-GNAQ@mail.gmail.com> <ounmuomkvyqv65mnd7mt50pp.1393269879902@email.android.com> <CABkgnnXttbpOJ5yALNB3XTo4EQPmh-vn3bV_Qmwz0+A-j8zhWw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnXttbpOJ5yALNB3XTo4EQPmh-vn3bV_Qmwz0+A-j8zhWw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: fi-FI
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.149]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrNLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvja72Uu5ggzNvrC2unfnHaLH2Xzu7 A5PHzll32T2WLPnJFMAUxWWTkpqTWZZapG+XwJWx6vk85oJz7BXfzt5mbmDcwt7FyMkhIWAi sevXOlYIW0ziwr31bF2MXBxCAocYJabPamCEcJYwSkx8/hMow8HBJmAh0f1PG6RBREBXYtHZ B2CDmAXUJe4sPgdmCwtYSXy4+pEdosZaYu/TLywQtpvEz8WbwJaxCKhKXFiyACzOK+Ar8e/O NajFM5gkTv64BNbMKRAosbP3LFgRI9B130+tYYJYJi7x4eB1ZoirBSSW7DkPZYtKvHz8D+ob JYm1h7ezgNzMLKApsX6XPkSrosSU7ofsEHsFJU7OfMIygVFsFpKpsxA6ZiHpmIWkYwEjyypG 9tzEzJz0csNNjMAIObjlt+4OxlPnRA4xSnOwKInzfnjrHCQkkJ5YkpqdmlqQWhRfVJqTWnyI kYmDU6qBcQKnqZnfhg1f67sz/cOPKUYEPrO9ybGSU7Jp5rrvmZcqvMMuu93V6fC0fnbCPZnN WfEwz28m7aiulUZ/F5Yc+/lRN0tc4+nD1U19j3Ju51hbX3VX01BI3OtZI3GxmH33K+7QZj6W +NsMj2pSm2uOb3m82usE621WhpXzDB9Y8vz89nL92goFJZbijERDLeai4kQA1hw9Yl4CAAA=
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/fR2cs8bHBILqLaP3BwPi9zx5vTA
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] JSEP-06: max-bundle policy questions
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 20:02:16 -0000

Hi,

>> But, should the application then be able to indicate which media type (or, even which media source) shall be considered "first"? The browser probably has no clue?
>
> I think that Justin has proposed a way to identify tracks that should not be bundled.  I recall no objections to this [1].  I'd assume that with only one track being marked that way, that track could be the one that gets ports and the others not.
>
>
> [1]... though I can't find anything in the API spec, and we did have the discussion at an IETF meeting and nowhere else.  Maybe the W3C don't know about it yet.

JSEP-06 defines different BUNDLE policies, but they are not on per track/m-line level.

Regards,

Christer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email