Re: [rtcweb] #31: Miscellaneous
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 13 September 2013 17:10 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE85611E8171 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 10:10:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.217
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.217 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.383, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J2N7wX8DvG-Z for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 10:10:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22e.google.com (mail-wi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E56A911E812F for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 10:10:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id hj3so1092430wib.7 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 10:10:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=meQf1RiNDcyQ0sQiFUQUqX+qqkoZ3mDIRSzxGyZUQC4=; b=oC2W+zlL3O+7z3Zmn6c1YkEi8sVZJx9E1MHkZN6XKcsZXuZwZvuP+UT7qf5ShSQjae +gy3KS1oQPvVFSpaHGDtRrJQN6WJKFlnTdkL/xsEeHPtp55nva73g3OXC1eTsFrgyEad aQw5O0YthDxG5xsWCKwiEcofgJMa0cxzd/JKDw1sZTcrqZ7I1xgxq4EPW5pO7mR59Smp SYiQpW9b7eJ/7NN+DO+FzuL2cRDnLT/yY9xxX3uh7o6VoTSoAA4fE1xpGO6iMwQmvpgQ dxbO5jbp9zlAd6/YX/zF2zLZru0ZZEwfugixb/b9kr+hSDFrRaL3Q5m1qNADxl82IvFg neGA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.93.3 with SMTP id cq3mr11958991wjb.26.1379092221456; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 10:10:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.28.39 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 10:10:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <066.72974763150f699b699079e791c67107@trac.tools.ietf.org>
References: <066.72974763150f699b699079e791c67107@trac.tools.ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 10:10:21 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnWipfeSP-y+jhj=gwNiOBazMZo6Qfcc8mx9y9=+-_vc8g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: draft-ietf-rtcweb-use-cases-and-requirements@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] #31: Miscellaneous
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 17:10:24 -0000
On 12 September 2013 17:18, rtcweb issue tracker <trac+rtcweb@trac.tools.ietf.org> wrote: > [BA] This text suggests a requirement for the browser to ask user > consent, which seems different from what is in F39: I don't know what question I would ask in this case. Well, at least as far as being able to be understood goes, that is. I'd recommend avoiding this sort of formulation, and would prefer that it simply be possible to avoid exposing IP addresses.
- [rtcweb] #31: Miscellaneous rtcweb issue tracker
- Re: [rtcweb] #31: Miscellaneous Martin Thomson
- Re: [rtcweb] #31: Miscellaneous Bernard Aboba