[rtcweb] No-Bundle in just one peer
Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Mon, 11 November 2013 18:12 UTC
Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 471B411E8234 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 10:12:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.676
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.676 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XERV5Rgnz+jX for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 10:12:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qc0-f169.google.com (mail-qc0-f169.google.com [209.85.216.169]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3815011E8235 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 10:12:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id x12so4516069qcv.14 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 10:12:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=vbYYVLMSWr1eKIYaJ07jecOukX0UcRXSDlDmm5WZRFQ=; b=hOklAZVpsharK+NFWLaQG5VcpQy9yh94TVlY9hGrf44T6r+6xdM6v3Q9FkWzWp2kYN PCS2vPKEHwOveA1y3UCoPURxOoq3M7eS4geQSYrqXopk4RDsgwqmylPEOGetfGeixmea akWQtyEDbH10fdyEx+zcqTA6cHi0NBEgIbUnL7p9HJtTaMOL3Caxi1zBqPfMzGnyEsq4 svadyC7NPyOEIDkJSZbdMZVgXAv1Bl4khmnMp8xGPbQ/pVfbmGcBjIBUWaoys4K6TAKM 3KjnZW+teNGmkrC3Ki9PeWbNT/Opz6qgCFaoOzowlK7hmc04L1Owdf1Px32W3FukA5KK im9w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkdile99elg50MC5tch5U7oNsyQcBxEM5T2semCujJNzFfG66FDHQczNuZbacEIkz7plGDd
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.49.12.111 with SMTP id x15mr49703104qeb.14.1384193521393; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 10:12:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.96.71.8 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 10:12:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.96.71.8 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 10:12:01 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 19:12:01 +0100
Message-ID: <CALiegfn0mrYe2V8pWUmOCgxXWDp_8DTKJmh1Fuadu+vi1e+pOA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b6d86fe24bb3204eaeaabd7"
Subject: [rtcweb] No-Bundle in just one peer
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 18:12:17 -0000
Hi, In case peer A sends a SPD without Bundle support (so it needs to receive incoming tracks in separate ports and send tracks from separate ports) does it aslo mean that peer B must not use Bundle? Or could peer A use two local ports (no Bundle) to send/receive tracks to/from a single port in peer B? Thanks a lot. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
- [rtcweb] No-Bundle in just one peer Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] No-Bundle in just one peer Lorenzo Miniero
- Re: [rtcweb] No-Bundle in just one peer Justin Uberti
- Re: [rtcweb] No-Bundle in just one peer Christer Holmberg
- Re: [rtcweb] No-Bundle in just one peer Iñaki Baz Castillo
- Re: [rtcweb] No-Bundle in just one peer Lorenzo Miniero
- Re: [rtcweb] No-Bundle in just one peer Iñaki Baz Castillo