Re: [rtcweb] No-Bundle in just one peer

Lorenzo Miniero <lorenzo@meetecho.com> Mon, 11 November 2013 18:17 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@meetecho.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD10121E8201 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 10:17:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.494
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.494 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jEesPckKP9iQ for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 10:17:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpdg7.aruba.it (smtpdg8.aruba.it [62.149.158.238]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7876711E823A for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 10:17:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lminiero ([143.225.229.166]) by smtpcmd03.ad.aruba.it with bizsmtp id oJHC1m0053c3Lvj01JHC2Q; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 19:17:12 +0100
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 19:17:12 +0100
From: Lorenzo Miniero <lorenzo@meetecho.com>
To: =?UTF-8?B?ScOxYWtp?= Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Message-ID: <20131111191712.59e4e44d@lminiero>
In-Reply-To: <CALiegfn0mrYe2V8pWUmOCgxXWDp_8DTKJmh1Fuadu+vi1e+pOA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALiegfn0mrYe2V8pWUmOCgxXWDp_8DTKJmh1Fuadu+vi1e+pOA@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Meetecho
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] No-Bundle in just one peer
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 18:17:22 -0000

Il giorno Mon, 11 Nov 2013 19:12:01 +0100
Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> ha scritto:

> Hi,
> 
> In case peer A sends a SPD without Bundle support (so it needs to
> receive incoming tracks in separate ports and send tracks from
> separate ports) does it aslo mean that peer B must not use Bundle? Or
> could peer A use two local ports (no Bundle) to send/receive tracks
> to/from a single port in peer B?
> 
> Thanks a lot.
> 
> --
> Iñaki Baz Castillo
> <ibc@aliax.net>


Hi Iñaki,

not sure what the spec currently mandates, but this works already in
existing implementations. Peer A just needs to do the ICE and DTLS
dance twice from its two ports towards the single port in B (twice or
more, in case you're not muxing RTCP either).

Lorenzo