Re: [rtcweb] SRTP and "marketing"

"Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterriberry@mozilla.com> Fri, 30 March 2012 00:58 UTC

Return-Path: <tterriberry@mozilla.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C049721E808A for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:58:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LuUhQAOeDoO9 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:58:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dm-mail03.mozilla.org (dm-mail03.mozilla.org [63.245.208.213]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 817B821E8086 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:58:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.129.69.85] (dhcp-4555.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.69.85]) (Authenticated sender: tterriberry@mozilla.com) by dm-mail03.mozilla.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9DBF4AEE7C for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:58:15 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4F750525.9030806@mozilla.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 17:58:13 -0700
From: "Timothy B. Terriberry" <tterriberry@mozilla.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20120113 SeaMonkey/2.4.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <4F72D6B3.40803@bbn.com> <5D67671F-417C-4C78-A560-0B16AC65E4E2@acmepacket.com> <4F73B2B6.9080008@jesup.org> <6493BD08-5A9B-48AB-8D5C-8778384948A3@acmepacket.com> <4F74DAA1.4080103@jesup.org>
In-Reply-To: <4F74DAA1.4080103@jesup.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] SRTP and "marketing"
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:58:58 -0000

Randell Jesup wrote:
>> Everything put forward today for DTLS-SRTP applied to the
>> browser-to-browser scenarios, but not gateways.
>
> Whereas I come at it from "I care about browser-to-browser cases and
> avoiding doing something that hurts them, and I don't care about
> security (other than sniffers) for gateway calls". :-)

And the difficulty is, a browser has no way to tell (a priori) when the 
other end is another browser or a gateway.