IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Proposed message to send to the IETF rtcweb and W3C WebRTC working groups.

tim panton <thp@westhawk.co.uk> Mon, 22 July 2013 18:19 UTC

Return-Path: <thp@westhawk.co.uk>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33B2E21F8546 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.299, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DGz+X3J3cUPx for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:19:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp003.apm-internet.net (smtp003.apm-internet.net [85.119.248.52]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44FA311E80E7 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:19:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 22676 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2013 18:19:44 -0000
X-AV-Scan: clean
Received: from unknown (HELO zimbra003.verygoodemail.com) (85.119.248.218) by smtp003.apm-internet.net with SMTP; 22 Jul 2013 18:19:44 -0000
Received: from zimbra003.verygoodemail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra003.verygoodemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B80E18A034C; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 19:19:44 +0100 (BST)
Received: from [192.168.157.113] (unknown [192.67.4.41]) by zimbra003.verygoodemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D595818A0341; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 19:19:43 +0100 (BST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E782506D-DDF6-4D87-A1F3-BA61D19A6CA5"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: tim panton <thp@westhawk.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <CAD5OKxumQ9+=UOch7oXAeju03gFX62m25cDfZwPgR0ET8aFDWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 19:19:50 +0100
Message-Id: <981F1A4D-245A-4F50-9A9C-6F22F00D8AC1@westhawk.co.uk>
References: <51ED4A45.9000703@ik.nu> <CALiegfk1kUuezLSOqfLRnFC7gNWXgjerv9Q_mPKrR01zp3mdqQ@mail.gmail.com> <51ED651B.3000401@goodadvice.pages.de> <CAD5OKxumQ9+=UOch7oXAeju03gFX62m25cDfZwPgR0ET8aFDWQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:33:13 -0700
Cc: XMPP Jingle <jingle@xmpp.org>, rtcweb@ietf.org, public-webrtc@w3.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Proposed message to send to the IETF rtcweb and W3C WebRTC working groups.
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 18:19:54 -0000

On 22 Jul 2013, at 18:45, Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Philipp Hancke <fippo@goodadvice.pages.de> wrote:
> I said this before, but since you insist on repeating your argument i'll repeat mine: I have running code doing exactly that.
> 
> It's hard work and there are some points where this is PITA, I have discovered numerous bugs in chrome (and the jingle spec) along the way, but it's certainly not unfeasible.
> 
> 
> Out of curiosity, does the same code work with Firefox?

As far as Phono is concerned - yes - but we had to do some work to make that happen, more 
work in fact than adding DTLS on the server side, which is (frankly) absurd.

T.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email