IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] What the gateway draft should say about mux/non-mux

"Rauschenbach, Uwe (Nokia - DE/Munich)" <uwe.rauschenbach@nokia.com> Fri, 31 July 2015 18:45 UTC

Return-Path: <uwe.rauschenbach@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C0361B3454 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 11:45:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rSr-X6DxPRBB for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 11:45:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (demumfd001.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D08611B3475 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 11:45:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55]) by demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPS id t6VIjC51004322 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 31 Jul 2015 18:45:12 GMT
Received: from DEMUHTC004.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.35]) by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id t6VIjBRs032436 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 31 Jul 2015 20:45:11 +0200
Received: from DEMUHTC011.nsn-intra.net (10.159.42.42) by DEMUHTC004.nsn-intra.net (10.159.42.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 20:45:11 +0200
Received: from DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net ([169.254.5.210]) by DEMUHTC011.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.42.42]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 20:45:11 +0200
From: "Rauschenbach, Uwe (Nokia - DE/Munich)" <uwe.rauschenbach@nokia.com>
To: ext Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>, Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] What the gateway draft should say about mux/non-mux
Thread-Index: AQHQy78tkj01AbA0AUWp46tuxkqao5316WFA
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 18:45:10 +0000
Message-ID: <56C2F665D49E0341B9DF5938005ACDF8196FF36A@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net>
References: <CAJrXDUGs_+AKNHhaJjB5udr9TZv7oFpJ7h3cJ_ToXUfUC5TEpQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOH6zCEfuH6xh8-sPSmW3y4Vt2cDudfAAtw5MXq90oyWQ@mail.gmail.com> <SN1PR0301MB1551E28A489A90A93FA2F8BDB28A0@SN1PR0301MB1551.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CY1PR0501MB1579BC38B75CBC58744A970FEB8A0@CY1PR0501MB1579.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <SN1PR0301MB15518198D375F21B973C091DB28A0@SN1PR0301MB1551.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CAD5OKxvUUSEyCfJcrxTJj68qKZuw6Ddze1Aw1QxXvTnGXT-qfA@mail.gmail.com> <AF9C5DDA-451E-4ED4-A0AA-9853A3983D59@gmail.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B348E29DA@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <CAOJ7v-2B0zO7aAjpf9-39o-Bjr7UB9=78Ry17JP8Fff8z_PMWA@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxvtn66yNf10_eSy-1wkD7PopWrmUNpcF+0O_VAzFXw0sg@mail.gmail.com> <CAGTXFp_DwcE5ybS2yypcezo-42Y60FqabBPBBFTgCkPBhmDeNw@mail.gmail.com> <67196805-ED4E-49EA-83AA-3F4C37B5BC50@gmail.com> <CAD5OKxuSSdE2msiP2Saoaka_6UhZBQPoTk27f=6RRNi8-ARtKQ@mail.gmail.com> <D8E1148E-D03A-40A7-8438-4B5AABDF959B@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <D8E1148E-D03A-40A7-8438-4B5AABDF959B@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.159.42.111]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_56C2F665D49E0341B9DF5938005ACDF8196FF36ADEMUMBX005nsnin_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate-size: 9748
X-purgate-ID: 151667::1438368312-000058E2-45088C3C/0/0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/mxG4Z_Dd8JVGARovyEY2nrLVnNg>
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] What the gateway draft should say about mux/non-mux
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 18:45:34 -0000

I would say that to interwork with legacy networks, browsers need to implement non-mux. Whether or not it is actually negotiated is a different story.

Kind regards,
Uwe

From: rtcweb [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext Bernard Aboba
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 11:32 AM
To: Roman Shpount
Cc: <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] What the gateway draft should say about mux/non-mux

On Jul 31, 2015, at 10:57, Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com<mailto:roman@telurix.com>> wrote:

Why would the gateway need to negotiate non-mux if rtcp-mux is supported?

[BA] IMHO, Gateways should be required to support mux like any other WEBRTC endpoint, but this is not what it says in Section 2 of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-gateways :


"If a gateway serves as a media relay into another RTP domain, it MAY choose to support only features available in that network. This means that it MAY choose to not support Bundle and any of the RTP/ RTCP extensions related to it, RTCP-Mux, or Trickle Ice. However, the gateway MUST support DTLS-SRTP, since this is required for interworking with WebRTC endpoints."


Assuming that browsers remove or do not implement non-mux, it seems prudent to require gateways to support mux so as to avoid negotiation failures. If we make that change then gateways would always negotiate RTCP-mux with browsers.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email