IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Glare in draft-roach-rtcweb-glareless-add-00

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Mon, 17 June 2013 12:09 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE9221F9B5D for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 05:09:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.742
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.742 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.064, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EuYfVUaAZeHY for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 05:09:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qa0-x22d.google.com (mail-qa0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F4FB21F9B4A for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 05:09:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id ci6so1395332qab.11 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 05:09:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=BWEbjxMTPsv10Voe6YBTbvc7XWK11TyaL/lV+efdTPw=; b=aAFe74XpBMqOJSwTZWycPtEuRbBpiwSTvBnvwuofCVGyJq5TyVlsyH3ylgldbhn61G rIE4FO1H8VlVO4qJr1trypg+YyGd859AWYK8y8IiUtP+0WDQbTV9psLkO/N7CHksm2dS MrQrtddA417zUXsq2H1xMVW/2i/nXjj8MedBtc+Uh0s66mHlAdOvJ3Mv7NGhShri8T3y pFnvG66gt0fnkuvhnEwHi9r2f06iEz2Ov9fVALT1974S9f6G1EANMLHdKQxy7I/Fbp9P EfwwaWFgyFAKVaEdg2OE+brvwjTQTzRk1DcUd0ZRxiosW5fenG/cMtoi5PtgWrXX5Q9E v74g==
X-Received: by 10.224.60.195 with SMTP id q3mr16669663qah.82.1371470996225; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 05:09:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.67.65 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 05:09:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3A62E8@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <201305081617.r48GHkcx4369224@shell01.TheWorld.com> <518A9872.8060100@nostrum.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C3A62E8@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 14:09:36 +0200
Message-ID: <CALiegf=B4U6UT0xafpNznYm0MKQD=RsRurOaju7qgpnK0E3Ekg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnnXsgf/uF1Bh6szlNwKNWVbmVbVX34wrywwhRM8O4eJPCinz0skNuy4MQtSV/c8xDk4h4q
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "Dale R. Worley" <worley@ariadne.com>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Glare in draft-roach-rtcweb-glareless-add-00
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:09:59 -0000

2013/6/17 Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>:
> I do, however, realize that it would require an update to 3261 and/or 3264,
> as Adam also indicated. But, if we end up needing a mechanism where only one
> endpoint is allowed to send SDP Offers,

> I really think we need to ask ourselves whether SDP O/A is the right mechanism to begin with :)

Well, after two years we still don't know how to use SDP to feature
and satisfy WebRTC requirements (this happens when a document format
is decided before spec/protocol/API requirements). So... not, SDP O/A
is not the right mechanism for WebRTC.



--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email