Re: [rtcweb] DTLS version for RTCweb
"Olle E. Johansson" <oej@edvina.net> Fri, 10 May 2013 09:12 UTC
Return-Path: <oej@edvina.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BBA321F8A74 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 May 2013 02:12:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id stbADsL96deH for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 May 2013 02:12:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp7.webway.se (smtp7.webway.se [IPv6:2a02:920:212e::205]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DCF621F8A48 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 May 2013 02:12:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:16d8:cc57:1000::42:1004] (unknown [IPv6:2001:16d8:cc57:1000::42:1004]) by smtp7.webway.se (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 356A393C1AF; Fri, 10 May 2013 09:12:47 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: "Olle E. Johansson" <oej@edvina.net>
In-Reply-To: <CEDD7FB9-8183-41D7-B771-DF38A747D4A0@phonefromhere.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 11:12:46 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2EFCE543-0532-4F6F-8E67-1109DA5DA257@edvina.net>
References: <518C1921.1010606@acm.org> <CEDD7FB9-8183-41D7-B771-DF38A747D4A0@phonefromhere.com>
To: Tim Panton <tim@phonefromhere.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] DTLS version for RTCweb
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 09:12:50 -0000
10 maj 2013 kl. 11:08 skrev Tim Panton <tim@phonefromhere.com>: > > > On 9 May 2013, at 22:46, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> I read the various security drafts and it looks like they all reference DTLS >> 1.0 (RFC 4347), but RFC 4347 was obsoleted by RFC 6247. So will the >> references being updated to use DTLS 1.2 as the base version, or will DTLS 1.0 >> stay as the base version, with possibility of negotiation to 1.2 and higher? > I think we should move to 1.2 - There are specific cases where 1.0 doesn't exactly do what we > want. > > e.g. I think for a server to ask for a client cert, technically in 1.0 you are supposed to list the CA's > you are interested in and you'll only receive certs from those CAs. In 1.2 you can leave this > empty and get a list of all certs (effectively a CA wildcard). What? Will any server get a list of all my private certs? That sems to me like a big fat privacy issue. /O
- [rtcweb] DTLS version for RTCweb Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [rtcweb] DTLS version for RTCweb Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] DTLS version for RTCweb Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [rtcweb] DTLS version for RTCweb Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [rtcweb] DTLS version for RTCweb Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] DTLS version for RTCweb Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [rtcweb] DTLS version for RTCweb Eric Rescorla