[rtcweb] DTLS version for RTCweb
Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org> Thu, 09 May 2013 21:46 UTC
Return-Path: <petithug@acm.org>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 569F521F8511 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 May 2013 14:46:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eYpyA1cy8MEd for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 May 2013 14:46:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from implementers.org (implementers.org [IPv6:2604:3400:dc1:41:216:3eff:fe5b:8240]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96FA421F84F8 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 May 2013 14:46:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2601:9:4bc0:29:a838:d0f7:fd6:917f] (unknown [IPv6:2601:9:4bc0:29:a838:d0f7:fd6:917f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Marc Petit-Huguenin", Issuer "implementers.org" (verified OK)) by implementers.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DD2E20375 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 May 2013 23:46:11 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <518C1921.1010606@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 14:46:09 -0700
From: Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130116 Icedove/10.0.12
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [rtcweb] DTLS version for RTCweb
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 21:46:14 -0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 I read the various security drafts and it looks like they all reference DTLS 1.0 (RFC 4347), but RFC 4347 was obsoleted by RFC 6247. So will the references being updated to use DTLS 1.2 as the base version, or will DTLS 1.0 stay as the base version, with possibility of negotiation to 1.2 and higher? Thanks. - -- Marc Petit-Huguenin Email: marc@petit-huguenin.org Blog: http://blog.marc.petit-huguenin.org Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/petithug -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJRjBkcAAoJECnERZXWan7Ee8wQAIpsc2/SoM+Kho7ESzZGIBVK 83z5uLT66YW96TX46lXoO5peuG+hJBF29yHXNe6UoAkMGhyPzEEJjbAkT4uD9X9d 3UVGuVyUAYtyF9QdmwOHyadBcVq9Ljd60oMoi1InPNnAnOafIVXczWOz2NlthEf3 n/KupaXDYXbJ1M/RHBEOpmIngpN0uGUNForns7NAm3ksMoHxdI6h0Xka23/Co9F7 vI1gJBix3KMl11bO6eqdD23EIYuFKkMDSr+sEX2ubyZghIa7gqQNVewj0MxteSXe QudGIMt7vwwFFMfGd+nQNFYtudiNd3+X+9B1zg/Qlp4j6FfOxVVI5Zf5kWIZRKX4 YLs9t36eLjGV5kaiBq7lpt0eTA6bAzP0qSYK5R2GXdkwxTi75lubomeU9tEzkZJ5 AM6qmskFhp49gAsU5T5QsKf5sdfY4qDaPoDdXo7nXnG4bTj5N6UkZ2tgdSQ2VNMi Gnkd2dOs92eNq8koTbLNtQfLMJkx7dPo3K7vQZr3Eoy+1/jGhRJOISmsNi7PhQEH ZlTInLgdFZlQCOw62UQl+3E8Ks8rE13av+HJRiWPL26goL1spmuXY9s/0r3NeGSK gw6v19yJiydFpERRv4d13KU0PQjitwpBi8tkXWNbKKKQUyf2LhJJ7AvjwdoAJgUw PDXRoadwWd3jEvk8lail =b/cm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [rtcweb] DTLS version for RTCweb Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [rtcweb] DTLS version for RTCweb Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] DTLS version for RTCweb Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [rtcweb] DTLS version for RTCweb Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [rtcweb] DTLS version for RTCweb Tim Panton
- Re: [rtcweb] DTLS version for RTCweb Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [rtcweb] DTLS version for RTCweb Eric Rescorla