Re: [rtcweb] Use case for smellovision

Time to start the competition for the mandatory to implement 
smellovision codec.

On 4/4/13 12:38 AM, Richard Shockey wrote:
> What are the Intellectual Property Issues with smell-0-vision?  Is there
> a patent pool here?
>
> Obviously you need to find out that first before you can define a use case.
>
> *From:*rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Suhas Nandakumar
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 03, 2013 11:40 AM
> *To:* Olle E. Johansson
> *Cc:* Cullen Jennings (fluffy); rtcweb@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [rtcweb] Use case for smellovision
>
> I think such an application can be embedded in the rtcweb-sensors
> attached to the sniff dogs for real-time big data analysis of smell and
> hence help solve the crime -  world peace
>
> On Tuesday, April 2, 2013, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
>
>
>     2 apr 2013 kl. 20:37 skrev "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)"
>     <fluffy@cisco.com <javascript:;>>:
>
>      >
>      > I beilve everything I read on the web, even on April 1, and
>     wanted to point out that Googles new search,
>      >
>      > https://www.google.com/intl/en/landing/nose/
>      >
>      > Is going to be critical that webrtc support media types other
>     than voice and video.
>      >
>     I do remember Patrik Fältström's first presentation of Internet
>     Media Types - MIME.
>     He said that they had attachment types for everything except smell.
>
>     Time to fix that, obviously.
>
>     /O
>     _______________________________________________
>     rtcweb mailing list
>     rtcweb@ietf.org <javascript:;>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>