BFD w/ static routes and single-hop eBGP

Pekka Savola <> Tue, 25 October 2005 10:28 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([] by with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EUM2r-0000RJ-Ub; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 06:28:41 -0400
Received: from ([] by with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EUM2p-0000Mc-Mg for; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 06:28:39 -0400
Received: from (ietf-mx []) by (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA05345 for <>; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 06:28:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ([]) by with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EUMFl-0005Y6-Hv for; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 06:42:02 -0400
Received: from localhost (pekkas@localhost) by (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j9PASTP21398 for <>; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 13:28:29 +0300
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 13:28:28 +0300 (EEST)
From: Pekka Savola <>
Message-ID: <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ffa9dfbbe7cc58b3fa6b8ae3e57b0aa3
Subject: BFD w/ static routes and single-hop eBGP
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>


I still want to see the details of BFD with:
  - single-hop static routes
  - single-hop eBGP

.. in some document.  At the last meeting, David said that he didn't 
believe these are necessary as the bfd-generic-01 doc includes this 
information but I disagree.  Even if the details are trivial (they may 
or may not be), as an operator I think it's vital to see them spelled 
out anywhere so that we can point vendors to a specific section of a 
spec in CFTs and ensure the protocols will be interoperable.

I suggest a section or two either in the main body of the spec or in 
an appendix either in draft-ietf-bfd-v4v6-1hop or 

All of this would likely fit in one or two pages -- and if not, that 
would be even stronger reason that those details must be written out. 
At least one deployed implementation of static routes + BFD already 

Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings