转发: Adoption call for draft-cw-bfd-unaffiliated-echo (ending 16 August, 2020)
wangruixue <wangruixue@chinamobile.com> Mon, 17 August 2020 07:35 UTC
Return-Path: <wangruixue@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECFE53A13D9; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 00:35:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IdMDIy4E88v9; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 00:35:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmccmta1.chinamobile.com (cmccmta1.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD283A03FC; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 00:35:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.3]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app04-12004 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee45f3a331a5d4-9aea2; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 15:34:51 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee45f3a331a5d4-9aea2
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from DESKTOPREBAVM3 (unknown[10.2.52.91]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr02-12002 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee25f3a33173da-90482; Mon, 17 Aug 2020 15:34:51 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee25f3a33173da-90482
From: wangruixue <wangruixue@chinamobile.com>
To: rtg-bfd-bounces@ietf.org, rtg-bfd@ietf.org
References: <03dc01d66f26$b1891600$149b4200$@com>
In-Reply-To:
Subject: 转发: Adoption call for draft-cw-bfd-unaffiliated-echo (ending 16 August, 2020)
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 15:34:51 +0800
Message-ID: <000201d67468$e4f3c4d0$aedb4e70$@chinamobile.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQMgHEk2cUclfrVN4T56wa/N8azm/6agq00QgAfttGA=
Content-Language: zh-cn
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/CS64VFNE1cAnjsSc7isMLjJEewQ>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 07:35:21 -0000
Hi I support the adoption of this draft as a co-editor Thanks, Ruixue Wang -----邮件原件----- 发件人: Rtg-bfd [mailto:rtg-bfd-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Jeffrey Haas 发送时间: 2020年8月4日 21:16 收件人: rtg-bfd@ietf.org 主题: Adoption call for draft-cw-bfd-unaffiliated-echo (ending 16 August, 2020) Working Group, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cw-bfd-unaffiliated-echo/ At the virtual IETF 108, Unaffiliated BFD Echo Function was presented. This is a followup of a presentation given at IETF 106. The authors have indicated they would like to have this work adopted by the BFD WG. This begins the adoption call ending August 16. Please respond to the mailing list with your thoughts on this adoption. It should be noted that this document overlaps work in the Broadband Forum (BBF) document TR-146. As noted in the presentation, the BBF document lacks some clarity and also doesn't discuss interactions with BFD implementations. This draft has good clarifications with regard to implementations of this mechanism when the a BFD Echo-capable implementation is used. This raises two points to consider as part of adoption: - This document with its current goals would Update RFC 5880. - The status of this document would need to be Proposed Standard. -- Jeff