RE: A question on OAM section in draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm

mohamed.boucadair@orange.com Mon, 30 August 2021 12:19 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtg-bfd@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CDEF3A0CBB; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 05:19:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=orange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uP5UBh4eTqMk; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 05:19:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.66.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 866C03A0B12; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 05:19:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfedar03.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by opfedar20.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTPS id 4GyqBN4j58z8smm; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 14:19:24 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.com; s=ORANGE001; t=1630325964; bh=FqgbxuK55KlXRZNhRKWjmkL/UvqgNc5AozmaLTVzHvY=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=EtkWan8P31F+ntdXXHwZVxAULR1G74UHg3ibXYZzJHA6bQDvGZJ36Y9qEsEyHVozz /gud2pLtGsLtusGminjGnMwEIGJeCgDrne9Hp3HkW6ocTUYS5O0cnxmi61e4UOLbom jhwR4BQwf5zoL3B7/QCgsTcRDJB5g4czWFeWkQJf14+cm9G5u/G8H/la2DMjZoMr7B xs42sFuDNEVDlnLyuxGi6UvGrmGz02aXuVUcgtRkwT/4hgoTtY/3P9rZh2Zc/MPn+4 32KQub/WOUMAbk0E3MGOzvybH4uElFJ0GvSAzUwhvh7SypOZj/EmNTclhqdlC7UCTp CCoeLOgu9xEXw==
Received: from Exchangemail-eme6.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.13.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by opfedar03.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTPS id 4GyqBN3SHnzCqkS; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 14:19:24 +0200 (CEST)
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>, "draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm@ietf.org>, opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>, rtg-bfd WG <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: A question on OAM section in draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm
Thread-Topic: A question on OAM section in draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm
Thread-Index: AQHXm7hUF01labWnJkKEocRBbmkog6uLuGLg
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 12:19:23 +0000
Message-ID: <5697_1630325964_612CCCCC_5697_162_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330353E5905@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <CA+RyBmUUbdsUz1=R=+Oq8K5uCVTHNUXA5P9ZMQ6qnnCEA_LgLA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+RyBmUUbdsUz1=R=+Oq8K5uCVTHNUXA5P9ZMQ6qnnCEA_LgLA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.114.13.245]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330353E5905OPEXCAUBMA2corp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/M6iGgdgjt8_QnCPeX7VsxDSgwus>
X-BeenThere: rtg-bfd@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "RTG Area: Bidirectional Forwarding Detection DT" <rtg-bfd.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtg-bfd/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtg-bfd>, <mailto:rtg-bfd-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 12:19:35 -0000

Hi Greg,

Thank you for checking the OAM part and for sharing this comment.

As you can read in both sections 4 and 5, this model is ** not a device configuration model **. The focus is on aspects that can be triggered by service requests and managed by the network controller. This network view of the service will be then enriched (with other sources such as local templates/profiles/defaults) to derive the exhaustive configuration that will be enforced in involved devices to deliver the requested service.

With that rationale in mind, you can understand why we don’t import device models but point to the authoritative RFCs for aspects that we think make sense to be tweaked at the network-level.

Thanks.

Cheers,
Med

De : Greg Mirsky [mailto:gregimirsky@gmail.com]
Envoyé : samedi 28 août 2021 04:56
À : draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm@ietf.org; opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>; rtg-bfd WG <rtg-bfd@ietf.org>
Objet : A question on OAM section in draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm

Dear Authors,
thank you for your work on this document. I've read the draft and have a question, and a suggestion. Section 7.6.4<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm#section-7.6.4> describes how BFD is controlled in vpn-common. I've noticed that you use references to RFC 5880. While that is the basis for all subsequent BFD documents, for BFD YANG data model draft-ietf-bfd-yang<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-yang/> may be more useful. Perhaps the container oam can re-use grouping base-cfg-parms.
What are your thoughts?

Regards,
Greg

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.